French, the language of diplomacy for much of the 20th century, carries an uncomfortable fruta among Spanish speakers: it sounds nasal, it’s hard to pronounce, and some consider it outright unpleasant to the ear. The accusation is not new. But a long exchange of views has again put on the table the question of whether the problem lies with the language or with the listener’s ear. The answer, as almost always when phonetics is debated, depends on whom you ask. And in under two minutes, the conversation jumps from aesthetics to the crudest utilitarianism.
Why French sounds nasal and hard to pronounce
There is an argument that keeps coming up: French has very nasal phonemes, but when well spoken and in an educated register it is not as nasal as it seems, and it is limited to about four basic sounds. The comparison is made bluntly against American English, to which some attribute a more stomach-churning and widespread nasality than that of French itself.
What does generate consensus is the gap between writing and pronunciation. French writes absolutely everything and then swallows half the letters when speaking it. The image used is that of a sloppy speaker who vocalizes terribly but writes with impeccable spelling. That asymmetry between what you see and what you hear is, for many, the real reason for rejection.
Is French still the language of diplomacy?
For much of the 20th century, French was the language of diplomatic relations, as argued in the debate. Today the weight has shifted toward English. That transfer lies at the heart of the matter: those who question French’s usefulness are not questioning its history, but its current return. The repeated argument is that, outside France and Canada — where it is also a minority — the language is present above all in the Maghreb and much of Africa.
The utilitarian reading is blunt: a student who masters English has access to almost all the cultural and digital content that interests them. At thirteen, two well-learned languages open more doors than a third one half-learned, according to this view. The consequence drawn is that French is increasingly learned for personal culture — to read foreign editions, to expand one’s library — rather than for economic return. Though not everything is return: some recall that the language has at least one work that justifies it on its own, the Cyrano de Bergerac that Gérard Depardieu made his own.
The Spanish 'j' did not come from the Moors
Where many locate the greatest defect of Castilian, the historical correction appears. The origin of the Spanish 'j' dates to the 16th century, well after the Muslim presence in the peninsula. The attribution to Arab heritage, thrown out as a commonplace, does not hold up. And it is not always pronounced with that harshness: in many areas it sounds quite soft, without becoming unpleasant.
The sound, however, does invite comparisons. A Spanish speaker describes it as a spit; a German, on reading ocho, pronounces something similar to ojo, and if another word with 'ch' is placed before him the result can be even more confusing. Phonetic coincidence between languages thus becomes a small battlefield. As a bonus, an etymological detail: zanahoria comes from Arabic, while in French it is carotte and in German Karotte.
German, Dutch and Russian share that guttural sound
It is not an exclusive trait of Spanish. The German 'ch' is pronounced in two ways: in achso or achtung it sounds like the Spanish 'j', while in ich or mädchen it is softer, halfway between the 'j' and an aspirated 'h'. Russian also has its version, and Dutch, with its guttural 'g', is not far behind.
That detail had unsuspected uses. In World War II, suspects were made to pronounce words such as s'Hertogenbos or Rotterdam: only a native Dutch speaker could perfect the 'r' and the 'g'. Phonetics, which serves to defend a language, has also served to unmask a spy.
Italian and Spanish, the favorites in the comparison
When voting for the most beautiful language, some put Italian at the top, though another participant accuses it of sometimes sounding like a coarse language because of its cadence. Spanish plays with an advantage, according to several, because of its simple phonetics, similar to that of Italian or Japanese, and because of its reach. The classic quote attributed to Carlos V — speak Italian with ambassadors, French with women, German with soldiers, English with horses and Spanish with God — continues to circulate as a summary of that imaginary hierarchy.
The conclusion that is repeated, and that disarms almost all trenches, is that almost all languages sound noble when spoken by someone cultivated and with an elevated register. The Spanish of a great dubbing actor is nothing like that of a TV panelist. The same happens with French. The exception admitted, with a hint of irony, are Portuguese and Dutch.
The usual doubt remains. If the criterion is nasality, the weight on the CV curve or the simple aesthetics of the ear, the verdict changes depending on who listens. A horrible language or a matter of accent?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (219 replies).
43% of employed people in the Netherlands work part-time, with only 2.2% involuntary. Working an extra day often yields less than half the gross increase due to taxes and benefit cuts.
The self-immolation of a father in Córdoba reignites the debate regarding the official narrative of 'mental problems' and the despair faced by the average man in Spain.