The Economist blames baby boomers for inequality: new doctrine or old excuse?
The Economist argues that baby boomers are behind inequality in Europe. Critics see an excuse to justify mass immigration and population replacement.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The Economist points to 'locusts' as the origin of inequality
The prestigious magazine has published an analysis pointing to the baby boom generation as the main culprit behind Europe's new inequality. The report, picked up by El Economista, argues that boomers took advantage of historic conditions — affordable housing, steady growth, post-war inheritance — to accumulate wealth, leaving later generations a precarious labour market and unattainable assets. But the diagnosis, seemingly technical, has triggered an immediate political reading.
Critics claim the report serves as a cover to push migration policies that, under the argument of relieving the pension system, mask a plan for demographic replacement. The debate heats up when it is pointed out that wages have been stagnant for three decades and that the boomer generation, far from being a scapegoat, still holds political and economic power.
What the debate reveals is a clash of narratives: are boomers the cause of inequality, or the beneficiaries of a system they now seek to perpetuate? The answer, as almost always, depends on who is being asked to foot the bill.
Related discussions on the forum
The prestigious magazine has published an analysis pointing to the baby boom generation as the main culprit behind Europe's new inequality. The report, picked up by El Economista, argues that boomers took advantage of historic conditions — affordable housing, steady growth, post-war inheritance — to accumulate wealth, leaving later generations a precarious labour market and unattainable assets. But the diagnosis, seemingly technical, has triggered an immediate political reading.
Critics claim the report serves as a cover to push migration policies that, under the argument of relieving the pension system, mask a plan for demographic replacement. The debate heats up when it is pointed out that wages have been stagnant for three decades and that the boomer generation, far from being a scapegoat, still holds political and economic power.
What the debate reveals is a clash of narratives: are boomers the cause of inequality, or the beneficiaries of a system they now seek to perpetuate? The answer, as almost always, depends on who is being asked to foot the bill.
Related discussions on the forum
- A Maghrebi man has residents of Corvera (Murcia) living in antiestéticar · 138 replies
- Police officer shoves a woman for no reason at all... · 218 replies
- This is going to blow up at any moment. You have been warned (III) · 14709 replies
- Things are kicking off in Tehran · 81025 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (59 replies).
More summaries
-
Baby boomers, the pharaohs of Europe's pension pyramid
The Economist calls the welfare state a pyramid scheme with baby boomers as pharaohs. In Spain, the late baby boom of 1957 to 1977 changes the picture.
-
The Economist accuses boomers of committing an "intergenerational heist"
The Economist targets baby boomers regarding an alleged "intergenerational heist" within the European welfare state. What is behind this accusation?
-
Immigration, housing and pensions: the equation no one can solve in Spain
The clash between migratory pressure, housing prices and pension sustainability pits two economic narratives against each other in Spain.
-
Uruguay's Frente Amplio proposes cutting pensions for those owning more than one home
The Frente Amplio proposes reducing pensions for owners of more than one property to raise them for retirees who rent. The plan clashes with the contributory principle.
-
Forum users demand Puente's resignation and speculate about Sánchez
Users on a Spanish forum are calling for Óscar Puente's resignation after the rail disaster and speculating that attention could shift to Prime Minister Sánchez.
-
Global Ranking of High-Speed Rail Networks by Weighted Safety Index
Japan has logged 60 years and some 3,000 km of Shinkansen operation with no passenger fatalities in commercial service. Spain, with around 4,000 km, sits at the bottom of the table for accidents.