The advice that divides: invest in ugly women?
After eight photos he discovers the 'ugly' one has a surgically enhanced body: the controversial strategy of investing in less attractive women and why no one dares with the...
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The advice that divides: betting on 'ugly' women as a future investment
Imagine: a man scrolls through eight profile photos on a dating app until, in the last one, he discovers that the girl has a surgically enhanced body that makes her the hidden target of the entire market. It's not an isolated case. In circles where pairing strategy is seriously discussed, a thesis as old as it is uncomfortable has resurfaced: women considered ugly are a profitable bet.
The long-term investment thesis
The argument, bluntly stated, holds that women of average or low attractiveness try harder to maintain the relationship, are less idolized, and offer a stability that beautiful women – often courted relentlessly – do not provide. It's the logic of undervalued value: buy when nobody wants, sell when everyone looks. In terms of emotional return, whoever bets on an 'ugly' woman ensures a steady flow of attention and gratitude, while competitors wear themselves out chasing the most sought-after.
But the market's own evidence contradicts the theory. Those who have tried this path warn that, after a few years, the initial label of 'ugly' becomes a burden: desire erodes and living together suffers. Today's ugly woman is the partner you'll want to flee from tomorrow.
The paradox of the underutilized beauty
The finest analysis reveals an anomaly: very attractive women often receive fewer propositions because men consider them unapproachable. That is, their high theoretical value does not translate into effective demand. Thus, a beautiful woman with a good body but an average face may have fewer suitors than an ugly woman with hidden attributes. The calculation flips: the beauty is the value stock nobody buys out of antiestéticar.
The result is a partner market where informational efficiency is glaringly absent. Whoever dares to look beyond the first impression – the next seven photos – gains an advantage. The rest, as always, pay the laziness premium.
Most shared
Related forum debates
Imagine: a man scrolls through eight profile photos on a dating app until, in the last one, he discovers that the girl has a surgically enhanced body that makes her the hidden target of the entire market. It's not an isolated case. In circles where pairing strategy is seriously discussed, a thesis as old as it is uncomfortable has resurfaced: women considered ugly are a profitable bet.
The long-term investment thesis
The argument, bluntly stated, holds that women of average or low attractiveness try harder to maintain the relationship, are less idolized, and offer a stability that beautiful women – often courted relentlessly – do not provide. It's the logic of undervalued value: buy when nobody wants, sell when everyone looks. In terms of emotional return, whoever bets on an 'ugly' woman ensures a steady flow of attention and gratitude, while competitors wear themselves out chasing the most sought-after.
But the market's own evidence contradicts the theory. Those who have tried this path warn that, after a few years, the initial label of 'ugly' becomes a burden: desire erodes and living together suffers. Today's ugly woman is the partner you'll want to flee from tomorrow.
The paradox of the underutilized beauty
The finest analysis reveals an anomaly: very attractive women often receive fewer propositions because men consider them unapproachable. That is, their high theoretical value does not translate into effective demand. Thus, a beautiful woman with a good body but an average face may have fewer suitors than an ugly woman with hidden attributes. The calculation flips: the beauty is the value stock nobody buys out of antiestéticar.
The result is a partner market where informational efficiency is glaringly absent. Whoever dares to look beyond the first impression – the next seven photos – gains an advantage. The rest, as always, pay the laziness premium.
Most shared
Related forum debates
- Why do we only get ugly Moorish women? · 107 replies
- It's brutal what a handsome man causes... It just peine to me and this is going further · 218 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (59 replies).
More summaries
-
Career advice: Is extreme effort a strategy or exploitation?
An analysis of professional growth: does going the extra mile guarantee promotion or lead to workplace exploitation?
-
Why philo-fascism is becoming a dating filter
Leire Díaz sparks debate with a car video: women seek non-philo-fascist men, bringing ideological filters to Tinder.
-
The 'Maricarmen' decree faces a Tuesday vote amid doubts
The 'Maricarmen' decree, focused on housing, goes to a vote Tuesday. Old rents, Junts, omnibus bills, and planned applause...
-
German twins Kessler die together at 89 in Bavaria
Alice and Ellen Kessler, the German Eurovision 1959 duo, died together at 89 in Bavaria; police suspect legal assisted suicide.
-
ISIS claims Moscow attack that killed 143 people
ISIS claimed responsibility for the Crocus City Hall attack in Russia, killing 143, two weeks after US warnings of an imminent threat.
-
Nadal argues athletes should earn based on revenue generated
In an interview with Ana Pastor, Rafael Nadal criticized extreme feminism and defended merit-based pay for athletes.