The 21st Century 'Disentailment': Who Will Pay for Pensions?

Pension spending hits €190.687 billion, financed by debt. Proposals include seizing properties and pensions from 'boomers'.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The 21st Century 'Disentailment': Who Will Pay for Pensions?
Pensions of €190.687 Billion and a Generation That's Not Enough

According to a figure cited in the thread, Spain's pension spending amounts to €190.687 billion. This figure isn't fixed by closing ministries or eliminating bureaucratic 'chiringuitos' (unnecessary government bodies), and is partly financed by debt as the population ages. This has given rise to an idea circulating in the debate that no longer sounds like a joke: a 21st-century disentailment (expropriation of assets) that would take properties and pensions from the elderly to give to the young. The problem, as almost always, is who truly collects at the end of the distribution.

How Much Does It Cost to Sustain the Pension System?

The system is sustained by contributions that no longer cover expenses and an upward trend linked to population aging. Some argue that the elderly have not financed their own pensions and that the deficit is paid by active workers. Conversely, another participant calculates that based on a classic contract of €1,800 net per month, contributions of about €1,300 (between employer and employee) over four decades amount to a fortune. The diversion to other expenses—not the supposed lack of contributions—explains the shortfall, according to this view. Targeting the contributor would, by this criterion, be shooting the wrong enemy.

The Generation That Will Pay for the Adjustment

Here the issue ceases to be abstract. Some point to those born between 1975 and 1995 as the most affected: they will have contributed heavily, retire later, and receive a meager pension. The Intergenerational Equity Mechanism (MEI) (a solidarity contribution) is cited as an example of imposed solidarity that drains the active workforce. Demographics don't help: millennials are no longer young, and the next generations aren't either, so the pool of contributors narrows just when it's most needed.

Are There Too Many Empty Homes or Not Enough Heirs?

The demographic winter is beginning to loom, and some anticipate the opposite of what the headline suggests: more empty homes than heirs. This, according to this thesis, explains why construction isn't happening despite declared demand, and why taxes on empty housing are discussed as the next storm. Another part of the analysis shifts focus to the arrival of migrant populations and the distribution between locals and newcomers, a territory where opinions heat up and data is scarce.

Who Gets the Wealth When the State Mediates

The point where opposing suspicions converge: expropriation, if it happens, won't end up in the hands of the young. Large funds and global fortunes would be the final buyers, with the state as intermediary and a commission along the way. Others summarize it as money passing from the elderly to business owners without the next generations benefiting. Inheritance, they recall, is already paid beforehand through taxes and contributions.

With spending nearing €190 billion and demographics against it, the only certainty is that someone will have to give way. Who, remains unwritten in any official gazette.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (65 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back