You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Terminal diagnosis: the hedonism fantasy collides with the reality of illness
The fantasy of selling everything and living it up collides with the reality of terminal illness: hospitals, pain and the need to put your life in order before the end.
Terminal diagnosis: the hedonism fantasy collides with the reality of illness
The question seems simple: if you were told you had six months left, what would you do? The collective imagination answers with a script learned from the movies: sell everything, travel, drink, have sens without limits and, at its darkest extreme, settle old scores. But when the conversation turns to people who have watched death up close — or who have been through a biopsy with a bad prognosis — the script falls apart at an uncomfortable estimulante ilegal.
Hedonism as the automatic response
The first line of thought is the most cinematic. It appears as soon as the scenario is raised: sell the flat, buy a sports car, head off to Ibiza and party nonstop for as long as the body holds out. Some put it more bluntly: "have lots of sens and, when I notice I'm losing my faculties, kill — or rather, do justice." The fantasy of final revenge — the assassination, settling accounts with those who have hurt you — is a classic of the genre, fed by series like Breaking Bad, which turns a terminal diagnosis into a sarracena permit for transgression.
But this fantasy has a fundamental problem: terminal illness rarely allows for that script. As a more pragmatic analysis points out, cancer and other incurable conditions usually involve hospitalization, exhausting therapies, pain and cognitive decline. "Terminal illness rarely lets you live a normal life right up until death," the argument goes. The textbook hedonism collides with a reality of hospital beds and palliative medication.
The other side: saying goodbye and putting the house in order
Against the partying, a more reflective current emerges. It involves letting go of attachments, throwing one big farewell party with loved ones, saying everything that was always left unsaid and then leaving alone. Some add an important nuance: getting hold of all the painkillers and drugs possible to stay free of pain but conscious of the process. It is not a headlong flight; it is a serene management of the end.
This stance has a practical counterpart that surprises in its thoroughness. Someone who went through a biopsy with a bad prognosis describes how, on the way home, they were already thinking about organizing their belongings: throwing out personal letters to protect their privacy, separating what would be useful to the family from what would not — the cables, the plugs, the light bulb adapters nobody is going to use — and making sure the important documents were easy to find. Death, seen up close, becomes an exercise in domestic logistics.
The nihilism that needs no diagnosis
There is a third position, more uncomfortable: the one that holds that nothing would change. "I suppose the same as I do now. Whatever," reads one message. The underlying idea is that we are all living with a terminal illness called life, only without a known expiry date. If you already live as if every day were your last — or if you are already dead while alive — the diagnosis changes nothing.
This current has a point of logic that is hard to refute. The question it poses is: why not do now what you would do if you got that news, knowing that by then you might no longer have time? The uncomfortable answer is that most people don't, trapped in routine and in "the prison of our mind," as one analysis of wasted youth puts it.
The weight of real cases
The debate turns darker when documented examples appear. The case of a 24-year-old diagnosed with a brain tumor after headaches and fainting spells: he died just over a month later. What did he do? Cry a lot, break up with his girlfriend and look for a way not to destroy his parents' lives, who knew nothing about it. The story of actor Andy Whitfield, who died at 39 after a lymphoma, is also mentioned as an example that illness leaves no room for great antiestéticats.
The conclusion many reach is unsettling: we don't know how we would react until it is our turn. The fantasy of hedonism and revenge is just that, a fantasy. For most people, reality will look more like crying in a hospital bed, sorting through paperwork and trying not to hurt those left behind. A terminal diagnosis doesn't turn you into a TV character; it turns you into someone with very little time and a great deal of antiestéticar.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (84 replies).
Analysis of the heated forum debate on journalist Ainhoa Martínez’s childfree choice at 36, highlighting the clash between professional success and biological clock in Spain.
A kindergarten teacher faces calls to be fired after a video of her singing a song about coins went viral. Is it over an alleged hidden message or something else?