Supreme Court Halts Vote for Beneficiaries of 'Grandchildren Law'

The suspension of voting rights for those nationalized under the 'grandchildren law' is deeply polarizing. While some feel slighted, others view it as curbing a right lacking genuine roots in Spain.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Supreme Court Halts Vote for Beneficiaries of 'Grandchildren Law'
The Supreme Court Suspends Voting Rights for Those Nationalized Under the 'Grandchildren Law'

The decision by the Supreme Court to suspend the right to vote for Spaniards who obtained citizenship through the 'grandchildren law' has been met with cold shock among beneficiaries, who feel “slighted.” However, the underlying debate is more complex: should those who have never set foot in Spain be allowed to vote?

A Decision That Does Not Go Unnoticed

The beneficiaries themselves denounce the slight, but opponents argue that the measure only affects those who obtained citizenship via a ministerial order relaxing requirements, not those who met the law’s criteria. The powder keg is lit.

Voting Without Roots: The Cornerstone

The most repeated argument is common sense: in which electoral census should people who have not resided, do not reside, nor plan to reside in Spain be included? While foreigners living here don't vote in general elections, a new Spaniard without real ties might. Furthermore, these individuals can continue voting in their countries of origin.

Interestingly, in Galicia, the descendants of emigrants already vote in regional elections, and their political inclination has leaned toward the right. Perhaps this is why some view the Supreme Court's decision as an involuntary favor to the left.

Nevertheless, the suspension does not resolve the fundamental question: is voting a right acquired through nationality or a privilege earned through residency? The Supreme Court has moved a piece, but the board remains open.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (47 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back