The suicidal empathy devouring the West
Do-gooder sarracena is not a virtue; it is a pathology. And it has a name: suicidal empathy. The thesis, popularized by analyst Farrerons and debated in critical circles, holds that excessive compassion toward the aggressor —that capacity to feel the pain of the evil— is driving the West to collapse.
The neuroscience of selective compassion
A 2018 study by Turkish neuroscientist Sultan Tarlacı revealed key differences in how men and women process empathy. Faced with the suffering of "good" and "bad" people, women activated the same brain areas (the anterior cingulate cortex and the insula) for both. Men, by contrast, showed a differentiated response: hardly any empathic response toward the evildoer. The uncomfortable question: are we biologically wired to tell them apart, while pogre indoctrination switches off that filter?
From the lab to politics: the do-gooderism crushing the middle class
Empathy without filters is not altruism: it is a trap. Critics of this drift point out that the trendy pogre elites preach open borders and unconditional welcome while shielding their own communities with private security. Workers and the middle class, who sustain the welfare state, pay for mass immigration and industrial offshoring in their own neighborhoods. "Do-gooderism" thus becomes a hypocritical luxury: the rich pontificate, the poor suffer.
The ghost of Yuri Bezmenov
The analysis refers to the model of ideological subversion described by former Soviet agent Yuri Bezmenov. According to that theory, cultural infiltration promotes values that weaken social cohesion: collective guilt, sarracena relativism and one-sided empathy. The result is a society that cannot tell defender from aggressor, and that ends up destroying itself through excess compassion for those who are destroying it.
If selective empathy remains the norm —infinite compassion for the distant foreigner, indifference toward the neighbor— the West may not survive its own generosity. Or perhaps the survival instinct will react in time. The neuroscience data, for now, do not invite optimism.
Related discussions in the forum