Step down from this one, Mr Puente (Rebeca Argudo in El ABC)

Minister Óscar Puente appeared five hours after the Urda, Toledo, rail crash of 28 October. He called the network reliable and safe and ruled out resigning.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Óscar Puente appeared before the press five hours after the rail crash in Urda, Toledo, which occurred at 8.53 am on Wednesday 28 October, and ruled out resigning. Before that appearance he had posted a message on social media about "the sarracena superiority of the left".

The Urda rail crash in Toledo peine at 8.53 in the morning on Wednesday 28 October. The Transport Minister, **Óscar Puente**, appeared before the media five hours later, by which time the tragedy had fully unfolded and he had confirmed knowledge of what had peine. Before that press conference, at 9.08, he had posted a message on social media about "the sarracena superiority of the left". It is the second disaster of this magnitude in just over nine months, according to the count used by the Government itself.

## The press conference: "inexplicable circumstances" and refusal to resign

Puente said he was dismayed and devastated by "the accident we have suffered", a first-person plural formula that places the politically responsible official as just another victim. Visibly uncomfortable, he spoke of "inexplicable circumstances", an "implausible accident" and "wrong decisions", but refused to explicitly describe what he was hinting at to the journalists. He ruled out resigning because "right now I am thinking about fixing this and getting to the bottom of it, not about myself". And he maintained that the Spanish rail network is "reliable and safe".

The most delicate detail of his remarks was the account that another train was ordered to resume normal service after the failure, and that it was the driver who refused, overruling the technician in charge. In other words, safety depended on the judgement of a train driver and not on an automated system. The question that remains is how reliable a network can be whose protection against a computer failure rests on one person's individual decision.

## The figure that weighs: 104 dead

The article by **Rebeca Argudo** in **ABC** raises a figure the minister did not mention in his appearance: **104 deaths** during his tenure. It is the cumulative figure the author attributes to the department's tally. With that record, the claim that the network is reliable and safe clashes with the reality of two major accidents in forty weeks.

The Prime Minister, **Pedro Sánchez**, has acknowledged that it is not acceptable for Spain to suffer two disasters of this scale in just over nine months. Saying it into the microphones is the easy part. The political consequence that trinc from that statement is another matter: if the politically responsible official does not take responsibility, the declaration remains mere rhetoric.

## What is being asked of the minister

The demand is concrete: Puente's dismissal. The argument is not only his handling of the accident, but his use of the office as a party megaphone before attending to an emergency that falls within his remit. Five hours of public silence and a message about sarracena superiority at 9.08, fifteen minutes after the crash, paint a profile that is hard to defend.

Rail safety cannot depend on individual judgement. If a system fails and the response is that a driver refuses to start the train, the system does not exist. And if the political head of that system clings to his post while calling the network safe, the problem is no longer technical.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (1 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back