Spanish worker sees income tax withholding jump from 15% to 24% overnight

A Spanish employee's income tax withholding rose from 15% to 24% after his first year at the company: 752 euros in a single payslip. How the rate is calculated and why it changes.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Spanish worker sees income tax withholding jump from 15% to 24% overnight
From 15% to 24% withholding in a single payslip

A worker in Spain completes his first year at the company and discovers that the income tax withholding on his payslip has gone from 15% to 24%. In euros: 752 euros withheld in a single month. His reaction, shared with a colleague who joined on the same date and saw the same jump, is what anyone's would be: "What am I, working for the tax office?". He is single, with no children, no mortgage, and owns 50% of an apartment inherited from family. And he doesn't understand why they are now taking almost a thousand euros more a year from him.

The short answer is that he was probably being under-withheld. The long one has to do with how the rate is calculated, with the adjustment the company makes, and with a very human temptation: asking for less to be withheld so you can put that money into an account paying 4% APY.

How the withholding rate is calculated

The rate isn't chosen, it's calculated. The company applies a bracket table to the withholding base, which starts at 24% for the first 17,360 euros and rises to 28%, 37% and 43% in the trinc brackets. That figure is reached after subtracting deductible expenses from total pay, including social security contributions, which come to around 4.6%.

The problem is that the company doesn't always get it right the first time. When it detects that it has under-withheld for months, it adjusts: it raises the percentage so the annual total adds up. That's why an employee who was at 15% suddenly finds himself at 24%. It's not a punishment. It's a correction.

How much do you have to earn for 24% to be withheld?

Here the calculations cross paths. With 752 euros withheld at 24%, the monthly base comes to 3,133 euros. If it's twelve payments, that's around 37,600 euros gross a year; if fourteen, almost 44,000. The estimates circulating range from 36,000 to 55,000 euros, depending on whether extra payments and variable pay are included.

The worker himself lowers the figure: he says he earns about 27,000 euros net a year. And there lies the key to the mismatch. If his real withholding should be higher than the initial 15%, the company has room to correct upwards. What it cannot do is withhold below what the table sets.

Under-withholding: the shortcut that doesn't always work out

The idea of asking the company to withhold less in order to put that money into a 4% APY deposit has its financial logic. The money not withheld earns interest at the bank, and the tax office gets paid the trinc year. But there are two catches.

The first is legal: the company cannot withhold below what the calculation sets. The second is behavioural. Available money gets spent. And in June the tax return arrives with a bill that can hurt more than the monthly payslip.

The case of the worker with no withholding

The mirror image comes from another employee: two months with no withholding because, not having worked the full year at that company, he didn't reach the minimum threshold for filing. The problem is that he did work elsewhere and will have to file a tax return anyway. To make up for it, he calculates that from now until the end of the year his withholding should be 26%.

The dilemma is a classic one: pay in instalments month by month, or all at once in June. Psychologically, the first is easier to bear. Financially, the second lets the money earn interest in the meantime. Provided you don't spend it first.



In the end, the question left hanging is the one from the start: if the correct rate was 24%, someone got it wrong for twelve months. And that mistake is paid for all at once.

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (14 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back