Spanish UCO Report: PSOE Cloaca Contacted Drug Lords to 'Eliminate' Judge in Sánchez's Brother Case

A Spanish Civil Guard report dated **6 de octubre de 2026** gives credibility to testimony from Cintia Rocho, who claims the PSOE's inner circle contacted her family to target Judge **Beatriz Biedma**. The document includes messages about 'eliminating' her and the saying 'a palos aprende el burro'.

## The origin: a note in a notebook and a message on a phone

The investigation begins with an annotation found in **Leire Díez**'s notebook. The note read: 'Judge Badajoz. La celsa. Heroine & Gypsy'. This clue led agents to Cintia Rocho, who identified herself as 'La celsa' and confessed that two individuals contacted her to 'remove' Judge Biedma.

Agents later found a relevant message on **Javier Pérez Dolset**'s mobile phone. It was an annotation from **17 de agosto de 2024** stating: 'Brother's judge, unparalleled choriza. Luis Sáenz de Tejada has the info'. Another note from the same device pointed directly to 'Destroy the brother's procedure'.

The focus then turned to former judge **Luis José Sáenz de Tejada**, whom the inner circle allegedly used to destabilize the judicial process affecting the president's brother. The UCO highlights that Sáenz de Tejada already had a 'particular fight' against the Badajoz judiciary.

## Meetings in Tarifa and a group called 'Vacations and trips'

On **5 de octubre de 2026**, agents took a statement again from businessman **Joaquín Parra**. He clarified that Dolset contacted him for contacts in the province of Badajoz. The former president of the local football club identified the ex-magistrate and confirmed they held two meetings at Dolset's home in Tarifa.

In a subsequent meeting, which Leire Díez also attended, those involved were interested in the information the ex-judge might have. On **23 de agosto de 2024**, a group named 'Vacations and trips' was created with these four people. One of their main interests was obtaining relevant data on Beatriz Biedma.

The UCO argues that the actions of the investigated group constituted 'a series of preparatory acts aimed at altering the normal course of the judicial process affecting the president's brother'.

## The 'cleaning' in Badajoz courts

Cintia Rocho identified **Ángel Martín Carrillo** as the person under the nickname 'Heroine & Gypsy'. She also connected agents with this man's lawyer, who was in custody. The Civil Guard considers it relevant that these two individuals were investigated for drug trafficking and crimes against life in proceedings where they showed their disagreement with judicial resolutions.

Based on this, they posted comments on the Facebook channel called 'Judicial Independence of Badajoz'. Seeing these comments, Sáenz de Tejada contacted them. Ángel Martín's lawyer had several contacts with the ex-magistrate, but the conversations were about another judge in the town, **María Hernández**. The lawyer denied that the possibility of causing physical harm to anyone was discussed during the meeting.

Afterwards, the ex-magistrate contacted Cintia Rocho over her comment on Facebook. On **17 de diciembre de 2024**, Cintia was contacted by a new Facebook profile named José García Fernández, whose identity was never known. The clan leader provided the UCO with conversations she had with this profile about the need to 'do a cleaning' in Badajoz courts.

Rocho stated that Sáenz de Tejada told her Biedma 'was a damn pain in the ass and that she had to be eliminated'. She added that she was struck by the phrase accompanying that instruction: 'a palos aprende el burro'.

## Surveillance, rumors, and videos against the judge

In his testimony, Parra said he was never told about attacking Biedma, but he did claim he was subject to surveillance by people being legally defended by Sáenz de Tejada. Through another channel, they spread rumors about the legal personalities of Badajoz.

The UCO describes a group of acolytes the ex-judge gathered from the local incivil world. All this while he used his YouTube channel to upload videos against Biedma, recordings that the judge herself had mentioned in her statement to the National Court.

The Civil Guard report, dated this **6 de octubre**, states that its purpose is 'merely expository and referential', and it is not considered a final written statement of the course of action the alleged incivil organization would have trinc regarding Judge Beatriz Biedma. The content is known one day before the judge goes to the National Court to testify as a victim before **Santiago Pedraz**.

The case is still under investigation, and none of the people mentioned have been convicted. The statements in the report are testimonies and notes that the UCO considers credible but which must be evaluated by the courts.