Spanish Right-Wing Politics Defined by Mutual Contempt

Spain's Right Wing Despises Itself More Than the Left

A paradox runs through Spanish political discontent: many self-identified right-wing voters believe the institutional right is worse than the PSOE. This is not mere chatter but a recurring thesis: "NOTHING in the world can be worse than the PSOE, NOTHING, not even the crappy right we have in Spain." This sentiment goes beyond partisan criticism, revealing that conservative voters feel represented by no one.

The prevailing diagnosis is that no real right exists in parliament. Critics describe all parties as "red, blue, green, and other colors," implying they serve interests contrary to the general good. Consequently, right-wing citizens are orphaned: they vote but do not choose; they pay but do not decide.

PP as the System's Useful Traitor

The most common accusation against the Partido Popular (PP) is not that it is left-wing, but that it is functional to the system. It is labeled "worse than the reds, anti-Spanish, pro-Latin American," with no project beyond "speculating on housing, bullfighting, guns, and slavery." This mixes ideological contempt with economic disillusionment: the PP allegedly does not defend average Spaniards because that is not its business model.

This argument concludes that "few decent Spaniards will have to leave this country definitively." This is not an isolated hyperbole but the logical end for those who believe the political system is designed so they never win, regardless of how they vote.

Immigration as Excuse and Business

Immigration is another major source of discontent. The thesis holds that there is a "peculiar confluence of interests between pogre-leftists and shady entrepreneurs": the former want mass immigration for ideology, the latter for cheap labor. The result, it is argued, is that native workers are trapped between two forces that do not represent them.

Economically, the conclusion is that employers dictate and parties obey. "Before Aznar's government, there was little or no immigration; after eight years, there were millions," it is claimed, concluding that "the employers command, and others obey, including the PSOE." This view reduces migration policy to a simple consequence of corporate demand for labor.

NATO and Defense Spending: The Proof of Betrayal

Defense spending is cited as definitive proof of betrayal. It is argued that "the current Prime Minister lied to all Spaniards and our creditors (NATO & EU) regarding increased defense spending," and that he "had to lower his trousers and sign whatever they said." The conclusion is that Spain appears internationally as a country that promises and then fails to deliver.

The irony noted is that right-wing voters blame the PSOE for foreign submission but believe the PP would do exactly the same with less fuss. Hence, the sense that there is no real alternative: only different gestures for the same policy.

The Party No One Will Allow

The lingering question is why no party emerges solely seeking Spain's prosperity. The answer given is bleak: "They will never allow it." The subject preventing this is unspecified, which is precisely the point: the abstract system blocks any option outside established channels.

Practically, right-wing voters are condemned to choose between bad and worse, with their disenchantment having no institutional outlet. Abstention, protest voting, or emigration are presented as the only coherent responses.

---

Is this mutual contempt a Spanish anomaly or a symptom of something deeper affecting all Western democracies? For now, the answer is not in the ballot boxes.