Interior Ministry ordered the UCO to halt investigations into the government and the Sánchez family
Leonardo Marcos, director general of the Guardia Civil until September 2024 —appointed by Sánchez's government— reportedly ordered the Unidad Central Operativa (UCO), the unit's central investigative arm, to "keep a low profile" in corruption cases affecting the prime minister's brother and other scandals touching Moncloa. The report, published by El Confidencial and widely shared on social media, has revived suspicions of possible political instrumentalisation of Spain's state security forces.
According to commanders consulted, the instruction was verbal and left no written record, but several UCO officers have confirmed pressure not to pursue certain lines of investigation. The aim was to prevent the inquiries from implicating the core of the executive. The news has been met with indignation in opposition circles and among legal professionals, who see it as further proof of the lack of institutional independence.
A pattern of political interference in the justice system
The alleged order to the UCO is not an isolated incident. Critics point out that the attorney general, the national police chief and the Guardia Civil chief are all trusted appointees of the PSOE, creating a web of loyalties that hampers any inconvenient investigation. "It's like The Godfather, but in Paco," some analysts joked on social media. The widespread perception is that the oversight institutions —judicial, media, police and legislative— have been subordinated to the interests of the governing party.
The case adds to a long list of scandals surrounding Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez and his circle, from the alleged irregularities involving his vvife to his brother's business dealings in the audiovisual sector. The absence of political consequences —the prime minister has neither resigned nor called elections— fuels a sense of impunity.
Why are those implicated still free?
The question many are asking is why, if there are indications of incivil conduct, there have been no prosecutions or arrests. The most common answer among critics is that government control over the prosecution service and police forces allows any judicial pogre to be blocked. "Spain is practically a Bolivarian dictatorship already," is heard in the harshest opposition circles. Meanwhile, cases affecting other parties —such as the Gürtel case— do move forward swiftly.
Against this backdrop, the debate over the health of Spanish democracy is more open than ever. Confidence in institutions —already low— risks collapsing if the judiciary fails to deliver a clear and forceful response.
Related discussions in the forum