Spanish Forum User Claims Reality Creation Is Now Instant

"Creating your reality is no longer nonsense": from firewall to instant manifestation

There was a time when the promise of creating reality —that what you project eventually happens— had a factory defect: good things took years to arrive and bad things arrived very quickly. That was the starting diagnosis. Now, according to those who support it, the mechanism has been unlocked. Since 2023, the wall that slowed down projections would have become permeable, and since this year, desired outcomes would arrive almost instantly. No laboratory signs this off: it is the story of someone who says they moved from hard level to medium level.

The claim has a second layer, more uncomfortable. Barriers to exiting the system would have decreased, but most people would still be feeding it out of inertia. If no one did, the whole setup would collapse in two news cycles. It is the part of the discourse that admits the least evidence and is repeated the most.

What domestic proofs are cited for creating reality?

The inventory is home-grown. A car on the verge of being scrapped that was going to ruin the holidays and ended up repaired out of pure stubbornness; the vehicle, he says, is still working. A product bought at dawn that dropped to half price just before payment —no promotion, no one behind it at those hours— and arrived and works. An old song that played on shuffle right after thinking about it. And a complaint resolved without issues because, he claims, he had thought about it beforehand.

Added to this is the economic chapter: better income than since his father's death, the ability to save something each month, and a portion of the paternal inheritance recovered because his mother was entitled to half by marital property laws. It is not a fortune. It covers holes.

The field notebook also includes noise. A neighbor who banged on the wardrobe left after a year in the same place. The same account describes going out into the street and finding peace, few people, and the sensation of shaping the day at will. Other times, however, everything arrives through stress.

What is transurfing and how is it applied?

The theoretical framework has a name: transurfing. The book circulates in PDF and, according to those who recommend it, it is advisable to start with the first volume, because from the second onwards things start to distort. The star technique is visualization, and a striking case is told about it: someone who had been sending their CV to job offers on portals without success rewrote the PDF imagining they already worked at the multinational they wanted, with invented position and tasks. That same week they called him. More than 1000 people had competed for that position.

The less materialist version of the same idea insists that money flows if it is not seen as an obstacle nor hoarded excessively: correct attitude and balance, without guilt when spending. And a manual warning: do not think about the negative, because if it materializes, the problem is yours.

Are the coincidences cited accidental?

To defend that the subconscious does not understand jokes, archives are used. On May 21, 1995, "Without Suspicion" premiered, where Christopher Reeve played a police officer in a wheelchair; on May 27, six days later, the actor was paralyzed in a horse riding accident. In 2018, Simu Liu joked on social media about being Shang-Chi; in 2021 he precisely premiered that movie. And before a title fight, a fighter appeared disguised as an old man: he lost.

The objection arises naturally: there were two and one had to win. Nevertheless, for those who list the cases, the accumulation of hits is used as an argument of authority, not as an anecdote.

Why do some see it as materialist and others doubt karma?

Here the narrative splits. Some consider it a mistake to use all this to get material things —money or partner— instead of for something higher. And some directly pull the thread: truths are mixed with new age junk, like karma or archons, ideas that, according to this criticism, require believing that immensely complex forces act with human logic. The criticism even reaches the word evolution: we are not machines, it is argued.

Against that, the defense of free will: everything is written, but one decides how to fit what comes to them. If someone says something unpleasant, engaging or not letting oneself be affected is a personal choice. Neuroplasticity, epigenetics, and quantum physics are invoked as backing. With less epic tone, another current recalls that one cannot completely exit the system: one dodges it, feeds it less, but does not live outside it. The comparison is cinematic: you cannot change the script of the movie, but you can leave the theater and watch another.

And a warning that fits perfectly. In "Open Your Eyes", the protagonist enters a virtual reality where his wishes are fulfilled instantly and ends up in hell, because his subconscious bills him for his complexes and betrayals. The fulfilled wish, by itself, guarantees nothing.

The calendar being handled points to 2026, or at latest 2028, for a supposed new beginning. While it arrives, the part of the story that does not close is the usual one: if projecting works, why does the negative continue to appear sooner and faster than the positive? There the debate remains open.