Spain's Sánchez Expected to Retain Power Despite Criticism

The intuition that Sánchez will govern again despite his performance

There is a prevailing intuition in political discourse: Pedro Sánchez will return to power even though a segment of the electorate considers his management disastrous. This is not a prediction based on polls, but a mix of resignation, historical memory, and distrust in the opposition. Central to the argument is the idea, held by several participants, that the PSOE was not the most voted list in the last general elections, but reached power through post-election pacts. This alleged democratic anomaly fuels the sense that the system always finds a way to keep Sánchez in La Moncloa.

The argument that Sánchez has never won an election

The phrase is repeated insistently: Sánchez has never won an election. In the last general elections, the PSOE came second, and only through agreements with other forces did it achieve investiture. For some, this invalidates its legitimacy; for others, it is simply how the parliamentary system works. The discussion shifts to whether "winning" means being the most voted list or securing governance. Some argue that with current fragmentation, no party will secure absolute majorities and governing will always require alliances.

Antiestéticar of fraud and distrust in the system

Part of the debate focuses on alleged lack of electoral integrity. Mentions include apps to send photos of ballot papers and recalls episodes like Venezuela’s, where ballots were photographed to try to prevent fraud. Distrust is not new, but now materializes in technological proposals. It is argued that if the count is not monitored, Sánchez could perpetuate himself. Others respond that this antiestéticar is unfounded and that Spanish electoral law offers sufficient guarantees.

The opposition as a decisive factor

Much of the conversation does not analyze Sánchez, but his rivals. Feijóo, Abascal, and other alternatives generate apathy or disgust among a sector of the electorate. The prevailing idea is that Sánchez does not win by being the best, but by being the least bad. With an uninspiring opposition, voting becomes resignation. Some claim that with a minimally decent center-right leader, Sánchez would no longer be in government. The fragmentation of the right and the lack of a clear project weigh down any alternative.

Wear from immigration and the economy

Among the most pressing issues is immigration. There is talk of mass regularizations and their impact on wages and public services. Some maintain that Sánchez loses votes because of this, while others believe it is insufficient for change. The economy also appears: mentions of terrible wages and corruption are made, but without concrete figures. The sensation is that discontent does not translate into an alternative vote, but into abstention or support for minority options.

International projection as an asset

A less common argument: Sánchez is the only Spanish politician with true international projection. He is compared to a statesman, even from a critical standpoint. That external visibility, along with the harassment he and his family receive, according to some, plays in his favor. The image of victim and recognized leader outside Spain reinforces his figure among his voters. It is not an economic argument, but it explains part of his resilience.

Mail-in voting and ballot papers: permanent suspicion

Distrust extends to electoral mechanisms. It is mentioned that if ballot papers are not manually counted and mail-in votes are not tallied separately, he could win. These are suspicions without proof, but they circulate strongly. The proposal of an app to send photos of ballot papers from mobile phones is the most concrete version of that distrust. It is argued that something similar was already done in the United States or Venezuela. The reality is that Spain lacks such a citizen verification system, and guarantees rest with the Electoral Administration.

The role of media and "bought" groups

Another line of analysis points out that too many groups are bought by the government. Journalists and media supposedly working to keep Sánchez in power are mentioned. It is a recurrent accusation, without proof, reflecting polarization. Some say that the PSOE has abducted voters who repeat slogans. The discussion shifts to whether that is enough to win or if wear will eventually take its toll.

What would happen with Feijóo or Abascal?

The question runs through the debate: Would anything change with the PP? The majority answer is no. It is argued that Feijóo is just another socialist and that his arrival would not miccionan a real shift. Others believe that at least the "pogre-proge-globalist" agenda would be halted. The conclusion, in many cases, is that it does not matter who governs because underlying policies would remain the same. That perception of the system as a monolithic block reinforces the idea that Sánchez will stay.

Desire for him to leave and lack of alternatives

The close of the debate is not optimistic. People want Sánchez to go, but do not see who can replace him. The phrase "four years of Feijóo would be worse" sums up the sentiment. The intuition that he will govern again does not stem from positive assessment, but from the absence of an alternative that generates enthusiasm. Meanwhile, the electoral machinery continues, and polls, for now, do not clarify if the intuition will come true.

---

Key data from the debate

• The PSOE finished second in the last general elections, according to various messages.
• It is mentioned that in Venezuela, up to 80% of ballot papers were photographed in 2024.
• Talk of 500,000 "newly arrived neurosurgeons" as an example of skilled immigration.
• It is stated that with 22% of the votes one can reach the presidency.
• It is recalled that previously a president obtained 60-66% of the votes, whereas now the maximum is 40% in Greece or 48% in the US.

Frequently asked questions

Why is it said that Sánchez has never won an election?

Because in the last general elections the PSOE was the second most voted force. For its critics, "winning" implies being the most voted list, not just governing. However, in a parliamentary system, government is formed after post-election pacts. Sánchez was invested president thanks to agreements with other formations, which is not illegitimate, but does fuel controversy over the term "winning".

What is "pucherazo" and why is it mentioned?

"Pucherazo" is a colloquial term for electoral fraud. In the debate, it is used to express distrust in the vote count and mail-in voting. Apps to photograph ballot papers are proposed, but there is no proof of fraud in Spain. Electoral legislation and the intervention of the Central Electoral Board are the existing guarantees.

What role does immigration play in voting for Sánchez?

It is one of the most repeated themes as a reason for discontent. It is argued that mass regularization and the arrival of immigrants pressure wages and public services. However, there are no data in the debate quantifying that electoral impact. For some, it is a decisive factor; for others, it is not enough to change the vote.

---

Voices from the debate

"Maybe he is regulating all these bastards to know where they are from and send them back to their country. Then I vote for him." — Topic: regularization and immigration.

"In the end, all those harassment actions that some groups are carrying out against him and his family will work in his favor." — Topic: harassment and boomerang effect.

"If manual counting of ballot papers continues to be omitted and mail-in votes are not counted separately, he could win indeed." — Topic: electoral count and mail-in voting.

---

Chart: percentage of votes granting the presidency

---

Sources

No external sources are cited in the debate.