Spain's 2.7 Million Civil Servants: Zero Firings During the 2008 Crisis

In 2008, no civil servants were fired; the purge froze hiring and cut salaries by 5%. The debate continues over who pays the public payroll.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Spain's 2.7 Million Civil Servants: Zero Firings During the 2008 Crisis
Civil servants as a refuge: why many rush to take competitive exams

Some secured a position three months ago, unexpectedly, and admit they now sleep like logs. They are not career civil servants in the strict sense, but public employees, "but it is practically the same." This scene repeats every time a conversation about money reveals antiestéticar of the future: the prevailing thesis is that if war and economic collapse burst private companies, the public position holds firm. Around this, a numbers game has emerged, mixing payrolls, debt, economic history, and even an investment letter.

How many civil servants are there in Spain and why are they considered shielded?

The country has 2.7 million civil servants, excluding temporary staff or the parallel army of subsidized workers orbiting around the administration. The million-dollar question—how long a guaranteed lifetime position lasts—has an uncomfortable answer: it holds, but not for free. A review of the 2008 catastrophe is devastating. Civil servants fired in the strict sense: zero. What peine was something else, more silent and effective: a brutal freeze on public hiring, the elimination of the replacement rate—first one in ten, then one in one hundred—and the famous 5% salary cut applied in 2010.

The purge, according to the most repeated analysis, was done by asphyxiation and non-replacement. The position is not touched, but creation stops. In parallel, the system cushions the blows: civil servants' salaries will rise by up to 2% this year, according to circulating references. With this horizon, the conclusion imposed on those watching the labor market from outside is simple: firing a civil servant is almost a myth, and those without a position should hurry.

Who really pays a civil servant's payroll?

Here the clash begins. On one side, the textbook argument: public spending is part of GDP and, therefore, more public spending means more GDP. On the other, the rebuttal: contributing to GDP is not the same as creating wealth. You can hire someone to dig a hole and fill it again; GDP rises, wealth does not. The State, it is said, moves money from one place to another and records it as activity.

The second front is the bill. It is argued that the public payroll is paid with debt and inflation, not with what the private sector contributes, and that if the cow starves, there is no milk to milk. The most uncomfortable version comes from within the country itself: without private activity generating enough money, a million-strong public staff cannot be sustained indefinitely. On the contrary side, the evidence from the last great crisis—cuts yes, firings no—plays in favor of the position.

Prison Service and other competitive exams: salary, difficulty, and personal price

When asked about specific exams, the most common is the prison service one. With seniority bonuses and complements, a member of the Prison Service can reach or exceed 35,000 or 40,000 gross euros annually, one of the best-paid in Group C1. The downside: working in a cage even if you have the key, rotating shifts, weekends, and heavy bureaucracy. Stability, however, is total once inside.

The trickle of candidates is constant. Some apply to three municipal calls at once, with exams spread across the calendar; some prepare for internal promotion without real need, out of pure boredom; and interim staff claim this status as a way of life. The motto hovering over all: study and get your position.

War as an excuse: gas, food, and a portfolio that understands no flags

The other major front of the issue is the war alibi. The conflict accelerated a rise in oil, gas, and food prices that was already brewing. Gas prices rose by 50% since the start of the war, and not a few household portfolios are wondering if this benefits them. The technical answer is the usual one: a company like Enagás is not a gas producer, but a technical manager whose business is regulated; a price rise does not automatically swell its pockets.

For those wanting to monetize savings, the circulating recipe combines a global accumulation ETF for the bulk of the portfolio, fixed income for the cushion, and a small percentage in crypto stored in cold wallets. The complete calculation, broken down item by item, amounts to a full course in financial education.

The shield no one should take for granted

Against the optimism of the refuge, a warning appears that comes like a bucket of cold water. The advice for those settled in a position is not to abandon it, but to train in something others need, just in case. Because states are not immortal and Spain is less so: Spain has defaulted seven times in the last 200 years.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (239 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back