Spain: Third-party ink cartridges save money but yield fewer pages

In Spain, third-party ink cartridges cost half as much but produce 10-20% fewer pages. Monochrome laser printers offer lower per-page costs.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Spain: Third-party ink cartridges save money but yield fewer pages
Third-party cartridges: Half the price, nearly the same result

A standard black ink cartridge in Spain costs around €20. A compatible one is half that. The main concern is whether this saving leads to clogged printheads or poor tonalidad quality. User experience suggests it does not: ink is ink, and only the chip differs. However, inkjet printers remain a poor choice for printing black-and-white documents.

Is a compatible cartridge worth it for an inkjet Canon?

Yes, with low risk. Long-term users of refills and generic brands report no printhead damage caused by the ink. The main drawback is capacity: estimates suggest compatible cartridges yield 10% to 20% fewer pages than originals. Yet they cost three to four times less. The math favors them.

Antiestéticar of damaging the printer keeps many paying for originals. Practical evidence disproves this: some have used recycled cartridges in five-cartridge Canons for over a decade without issues. Wear comes from infrequent use and dried heads, not the ink source.

The issue isn't the cartridge: it's inkjet technology

Consensus is strong here. Inkjets are designed for daily use; if idle, nozzles clog. Automatic cleaning cycles often just waste ink and fill maintenance boxes. Advice: print something every two weeks to keep ink flowing.

For black-and-white document printing, monochrome laser printers are repeatedly recommended. Cost per page drops significantly. Some find compatible toner for €9 yielding ~3,000 copies, versus €15 for 1,600–1,800 pages on basic laser units. Others bought a mono laser with scanner and duplexing for €120.

What about tonalidad lasers and compatible toners?

The picture changes. Compatible toners work well in black-and-white but vary in tonalidad. Some leak powder, dirtying the machine, and print quality may lag behind originals. One solution: buy second-hand original toners from those replacing broken printers. Stockpiles last years.

Samsung is flagged as problematic for tonalidad. Their tonalidad devices, even with original toner, cause headaches, and compatibles worsen failures. In monochrome, Samsung performs well. Other brands are preferred for tonalidad.

Avoiding cartridges: Refillable tanks

A third option exists: refillable tank printers like Epson Ecotank. They cost more upfront but pay off immediately. Bottled ink is cheap and lasts long. This system appeals to high-volume users wanting to forget cartridge prices.

Full calculations show significant savings compared to looking only at purchase price. Conclusion: Original cartridges aren't expensive due to ink, but because the business model relies on ink sales, not hardware.



Prediction with caveats: As long as home inkjets dominate, compatible cartridges will have a market. If monochrome laser and tank printer prices keep falling, the question becomes moot. No timeline, but the direction is clear.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (26 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back