Claude, the "friendly" AI threatening to put office workers out of a job
Four days after the launch of Claude Opus 4.6, the head of safeguards at Anthropic, the company behind it, resigned. The artificial intelligence that promised to be ethical and safe is already sending shockwaves through the white-collar job market and the stock exchanges. But is it really that serious, or are we looking at another trial balloon that deflates the moment you poke it?
The stock market quake: real cause or the perfect excuse?
The main argument of the article circulating is that Claude makes millions of consulting, analysis and management jobs unnecessary, and that is why the shares of the big consulting firms have collapsed. It is not that Claude arrived out of nowhere; it is that the valuation bubble of those companies, based on billable hours and little added value, was already ripe for bursting. AI was the trigger, not the cause. As one line of analysis puts it, "the crash isn't caused by Claude, it's caused by the bubble."
Next-day skepticism: the AI that never arrives
But the most widespread reaction among observers is disbelief. "This is the typical hype story that fades away after a few months," reads one comment. Similar warnings have come in previous years and in the end nothing ever peine. What is more, public employment in Spain, with its rigidity, seems immune: "If you're a civil servant you can rest easy... not even with boiling water." Even manual work — unloading trucks, sweeping warehouses — is presented as a refuge from office automation. The irony is that those laughing hardest at the threat are the ones in the least skilled jobs, while office workers tremble.
The paradox of artificial ethics
The most striking detail of the whole affair is that Claude was born as the good alternative, the kind and responsible AI. Its creators, the Amodei brothers, sold an ethical product. But the very person in charge of keeping it that way has resigned, and the most powerful model, Opus 4.6, has launched without sufficient safeguards. What is left of the original promise? A pitch that, as one analyst notes, "reads as totally synthetic."
The question left hanging is whether this time it is for real or whether, as with other innovations, the labor market will readjust without major upheaval. The data in the thread offer no certainty, only the skepticism of those who have seen many apocalyptic prophecies come to nothing.
Related forum debates