You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Shiba Inu: From €1,000 to €100M Windfall or Lottery?
A €1,000 Shiba Inu investment theoretically grew to over €100 million. The challenge lies in selling without crashing the price and facing tax implications.
From €1,000 to €100 Million: The Windfall Almost Nobody Cashed
Turning €1,000 into more than €100 million. This figure circulates as proof that anyone could get rich with a meme coin, but it hides an uncomfortable question: how many held until the end? Based on experience with such assets, practically nobody. The windfall exists on paper; the investor who collects it rarely does.
The case of **Shiba Inu** has become the new totem of extreme speculation. Anyone who invested €1,000 in January and left it untouched, according to the narrative starting this discussion, would have over €100 million today. Comparisons with **Dogecoin** and **Bitcoin** over ten years serve the same purpose: proving that appreciation exists. What they don't prove is that it's reproducible.
The Problem of Selling a Million Worth a Hundred
The first trap is liquidity. A portfolio valued at €100 million at current prices doesn't turn into €100 million when sold. If liquidated all at once, the price crashes, and what you pocket may be a fraction. The realistic exit is gradual, accepting that each sale pressures the price down. The calculation circulating in the conversation is eloquent: from a theoretical €100 million portfolio, you might end up extracting thirty, if lucky.
The second trap is fiscal and operational. Between exchange fees, token-to-stablecoin conversion, fiat withdrawal, and the corresponding bite from the tax authority (Hacienda), the percentage lost along the way is notable. An exercise proposed in the message exchange reduces a theoretical million to about €500,000 net. It's still a lot of money. It's not retirement forever.
Who Holds a x100 Without Touching the Button?
Here is the core issue. Doubling or tripling your investment and selling is what most people do. Holding when the position is worth ten, twenty, or a hundred times what was put in requires psychological strength few possess. The pattern repeats: sell early, celebrate the profit, then lament what could have been. The anecdote of someone who mined Dogecoin and lost access to their wallet on an exchange—with peak value around €75,000—illustrates the other side: even those who had the tokens didn't cash out.
Some argue that true talent isn't picking the right coin, but not selling when the balance multiplies. It's a rare skill. And it's not taught anywhere.
The Yard of Windfalls That Actually Worked
Comparison with the stock market appears quickly: Netflix, Google, Microsoft, Monster. Also pharmaceutical companies that multiplied by ten in months. The argument is that windfalls aren't exclusive to crypto, but belong to any market where a small asset becomes big. With hindsight, everyone would have bought.
Other voices point out the difference: a share represents a company that can pay dividends and grow revenue. A cryptocurrency without clear utility relies on confidence that someone else will pay more. When that confidence breaks, there's no balance sheet to support the price. Hence the recurring comparison to the lottery: the probability of picking the right coin and timing is tiny, though the prize is real.
The Suspicion of the Invisible Hand
The underlying question raised by this case is whether there's something more than speculation behind these appreciations. Institutions printing money, actors capable of moving markets, narratives interested in exciting small investors. There's no proof of any of this in the discussion; what exists is a vague intuition that such a rise can't be entirely spontaneous.
The counterargument is simpler: in a lightly regulated market, with limited-supply tokens and noisy communities, enough convinced buyers are needed to move the price. No conspiracy required. Just people buying.
The Next Coin and Money That Isn't Withdrawn
The pattern repeats with each cycle: a token appears, multiplies, gets talked about, new money enters, and those who exit first win. Latecomers finance the windfalls of early birds. The lingering operational question is how many small bets one must make for a single win to compensate all others. And how loud the flute needs to sound.
The cautious prediction: as long as low-unit-price tokens and narrative-generating communities exist, new episodes like this will occur. What won't change is the arithmetic of the exit. Whoever sells first gets paid; whoever waits for the dreamed million likely stays watching the screen.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (79 replies).