Sex workers of Spain's Stop Abolición platform launch campaign against Sánchez

The Stop Abolición platform has turned a message addressed to Pedro Sánchez into a political campaign, arguing that sens work is a diverse activity and that anyone who has had it close in their family knows it. The text, published by THE OBJECTIVE, frames the debate around the abolition of prostitution.

The Stop Abolición platform has launched a direct message against the Prime Minister, **Pedro Sánchez**, amid the public discussion on the abolition of prostitution. It did so through a post published by **THE OBJECTIVE** in which it addresses him in the second person and reminds him that anyone who has had sens work close in their family cannot be unaware that it is "a diverse activity".

## A campaign with a specific recipient

The text is not a generic statement. It addresses Sánchez personally and uses family closeness as its argument: if sens work has been present in someone's environment, it is impossible to ignore its variety. The platform turns that idea into the core of its campaign against abolitionism.

The message comes at a time when the debate on banning or regulating prostitution is on the political agenda. The platform sides with those who believe the activity should not be abolished and demand recognition of its diversity.

## The diversity argument

The central claim holds that sens work is not a homogeneous block. Against abolitionist positions, which treat it as a form of exploitation to be eradicated, the platform stresses that there are different realities within the activity.

That approach is what gives the campaign its meaning: the question is not only whether to ban it, but how the activity is described. The platform argues that any public policy must start from that variety rather than from a single image.

## An open political debate

The publication comes amid confrontation between abolitionist and regulationist positions. The platform chooses the Prime Minister as its interlocutor, which raises the tone of the message and makes it part of the political dispute.

The text offers no figures or concrete proposals. Its strength lies in the direct address and the family argument, designed to unsettle those who defend abolition. It is a campaign message, not a technical report.