Russian 'alien' video dismissed online as a hoax

The video of a supposed alien filmed in Russia has drawn mockery and comparisons to Nicole Kidman and the effects of vodka. Hoax or sighting?

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Russian 'alien' video dismissed online as a hoax

The latest video of a supposed alien filmed in Russia has been met with overwhelming skepticism. What some call proof is, for most people, a pathetic fake. Reactions on social media range from mockery to sarcasm, with comparisons running from an unmade-up Nicole Kidman to the effects of vodka.

A fake that convinces no one

The footage, of Russian origin, shows a figure that some interpret as a being from another world. But the consensus is that it is a video of terrible quality and zero credibility. The kindest comments call it a heartbreaking document, clearly in an ironic tone. Others simply point to a drunk Russian or a mere reflection.

The precedent of the glowing-eyes party

The video has reminded people of an older one: a party of wealthy Russians where, when the lights went out, some guests' eyes glowed in the dark. That one was also debunked as a lighting trick, but it spawned conspiracy theories. The comparison reinforces the idea that the online community prefers to laugh rather than believe.

Politics and aliens

Some reactions have gone further, suggesting that the supposed alien was trying to land in Algeciras to be taken in by NGOs. A comment that mixes migration and extraterrestrials with a touch of political irony. Another noted that the creature resembles Miguel Sebastián, the former Spanish minister, in an attempt to ridicule the scene even more.

The video is nothing more than entertainment for skeptics. If this episode proves anything, it is that while some believe they see aliens, others prefer to see the hand of vodka. The mystery, for now, remains grounded.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (23 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back