Russia Launches Six Missile Waves Over Ukraine in One Night

Six missile waves over Ukraine in one night

Russia launched six consecutive waves of missiles over Ukrainian territory early this morning, with explosions recorded in Odesa, Dnipro, Nikolaev, Cherkasy, and Zaporizhzhia, according to social media reports. Trinc the missiles came the usual pattern: attack drones known as Geraniums. The entire map lit up, and not because of streetlights.

The debate surrounding the attack has less to do with damage reports and more with the old question of who is winning this war. While some celebrate each impact as a point, others pull out the calculator and recall that the cost of a Kinzhal hypersonic missile is not paid by the recipient, but by the manufacturer. And that is where the problem begins.

---

What is known about tonight's attack

Testimonies circulating online describe simultaneous explosions in several regions, with air raid sirens sounding widely. One account tracking the conflict in real time summarizes it plainly: the largest missile attack recorded to date. The figure, of course, is not an official statistic.

The technical detail that has circulated most is the use of the Kh-22 missile, known in NATO as the AS-4 Kitchen, a heavy weapon designed for naval targets that has been used against land infrastructure in this conflict. The use of several Kinzhals in a single operation, something not previously seen with such intensity, is also mentioned. If hypersonic production has increased, the message goes beyond Ukraine.

---

The real cost: who pays for each missile

This is where the debate gets interesting. A hypersonic missile costs a fortune; a Geranium drone costs a ridiculous fraction of that. The strategy described is that of one who is not in a hurry: destroy a transformer with a cheap drone, let it be repaired, and destroy it again. The Kyiv thermal power plant, repaired and struck again, is the repeated example.

The argument launched from that side is uncomfortable: if sanctions worked, Kinzhal production would not have increased. The conclusion drawn is that sanctions are working, but for Europe, not for Russia. It is a debatable thesis, but it has the virtue of not hiding the bill under the rug.

---

The narrative of victory and its cracks

On the other hand, another current insists that Ukraine is winning, that Russia is defeated, and that Bakhmut will be its end. The problem is that this narrative has been repeating for months while the explosion map continues to grow. Some compare it to a football match: own goals are celebrated, and the rival's are ignored.

The most repeated irony is about Ukrainian air defense missiles falling in another country's field. It is not a verified claim, but a jab. Yet it reflects a real distrust of official reports, which only count what suits them.

---

What Europe is playing in all this

Ukraine's leap to "the next ones could be us" is not empty rhetoric. Georgia is mentioned as a possible new front, and it is recalled that Spain is a tourist and second-home destination for many British people, which some see as an involuntary shield. Others see it as a lottery that eventually ends.

The most uncomfortable figure in this line: if the war lasts a decade, Russia benefits. European inflation, rising unemployment, and energy costs are the other side of the coin. The lingering question is how long the European economy can withstand before the electorate starts doing the math.

---

With this pace of attacks and production capacity, it is reasonable to expect more nights like tonight. What is less clear is whether anyone has a plan for when fatigue replaces propaganda.