Rothschild, Titanic and the Fed: conspiracy or coincidence?
Titanic 1912, Fed 1913: coincidence or conspiracy? We examine whether the sinking eliminated opponents of the central bank and the Rothschilds' real role.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
The sinking of the Titanic and the birth of the Federal Reserve: myth and reality
The Titanic sank in 1912; the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. The timing has fueled for decades the theory that the shipwreck was a targeted assassination of the leading opponents of the US central bank. But the available evidence points to a more mundane reality: opportunism, not conspiracy.
Notable passengers and the monetary debate
Among the Titanic's victims were John Jacob Astor IV, Isidor Straus (Macy's) and Benjamin Guggenheim, all heavyweights of New York banking and industry. In 1911-1912, the Aldrich plan, the forerunner of the Fed, faced fierce opposition in Congress and among Midwest bankers, who antiestéticared control by the East Coast. The deaths of these magnates removed critical voices, but there is no evidence that the sinking was deliberate.
The role of the Rothschilds
The Rothschild family had been trying to break into the American financial system since 1776. They financed cotton imports in 1804, acted as British agents in the war of 1812, but lost direct control of American banking in the mid-19th century. They regained influence through houses such as Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and J.P. Morgan, but the Fed was not their exclusive creation, rather a pact between New York bankers and politicians.
The timing factor
If the Rothschild strategy had been a master plan, it would hardly have needed more than a century to come to fruition. The reality is that they took advantage of crises, such as the one in 1907, to sell the need for a lender of last resort. The Titanic was a logistical and human catastrophe, not a financial operation. Attributing a causal role in the creation of the Fed means attributing far too much intelligence to an iceberg.
Related discussions in the forum
The Titanic sank in 1912; the Federal Reserve was created in 1913. The timing has fueled for decades the theory that the shipwreck was a targeted assassination of the leading opponents of the US central bank. But the available evidence points to a more mundane reality: opportunism, not conspiracy.
Notable passengers and the monetary debate
Among the Titanic's victims were John Jacob Astor IV, Isidor Straus (Macy's) and Benjamin Guggenheim, all heavyweights of New York banking and industry. In 1911-1912, the Aldrich plan, the forerunner of the Fed, faced fierce opposition in Congress and among Midwest bankers, who antiestéticared control by the East Coast. The deaths of these magnates removed critical voices, but there is no evidence that the sinking was deliberate.
The role of the Rothschilds
The Rothschild family had been trying to break into the American financial system since 1776. They financed cotton imports in 1804, acted as British agents in the war of 1812, but lost direct control of American banking in the mid-19th century. They regained influence through houses such as Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and J.P. Morgan, but the Fed was not their exclusive creation, rather a pact between New York bankers and politicians.
The timing factor
If the Rothschild strategy had been a master plan, it would hardly have needed more than a century to come to fruition. The reality is that they took advantage of crises, such as the one in 1907, to sell the need for a lender of last resort. The Titanic was a logistical and human catastrophe, not a financial operation. Attributing a causal role in the creation of the Fed means attributing far too much intelligence to an iceberg.
Related discussions in the forum
- What kind of mental derangement led Spaniards to vote for Pedro Sánchez in 2023? · 63 replies
- Why doesn't Pedro Sánchez call early elections · 37 replies
- Can anyone explain why FOOD INFLATION IN SPAIN is 30% HIGHER than the European average when we are PRODUCERS..... · 50 replies
- BOMBSHELL | The socialist love triangle between María Jesús Montero, Leire Díez and Vicente Fernández may be what brings down Pedro Sánchez · 46 replies
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (27 replies).
More summaries
-
Inurrieta: central banks can create unlimited money, but at what cost
Economist Alejandro Inurrieta says central banks can create money without limit. Critics warn that inflation destroys purchasing power. Reality or trap?
-
Spain confronts the dilemma of what to do with gold held in the US Federal Reserve
Spain holds gold deposits at the U.S. Federal Reserve. The repatriation of reserves by other European countries raises the question: is it time to bring it back?
-
Milei bans deficit, restricts Central Bank in structural reform
Argentina's new law prohibits money printing for state funding and targets investment grade status amid falling inflation.
-
Jail for Sánchez? Spain's rift over impunity and corruption
Corruption allegations against Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez and his government have reignited the debate on impunity. Will the prime minister end up in prison, or will history repeat itself?
-
Feijóo, the leader who fails to convince even his own base
Feijóo faces growing internal criticism over his lack of a real alternative to Sánchez and tactical moves that benefit him. Senate voting records and migration proposals fuel the discontent.
-
Shooting on Balmes Street: crime and economics in Barcelona
A gangland settling of scores outside the Balmes police station, minutes from the Pope's route. The economic impact of violence on Barcelona's housing and tourism.