You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Roleplaying Valle-Inclán with AI: the new pastime dividing users
Users are rushing to roleplay the Spanish writer Valle-Inclán with AI, but the models' memory keeps failing. Gemini, GPT, Perplexity... which one stays in character longest?
Roleplaying Valle-Inclán with AI: between the grotesque and the effective
A literature fan sits down in front of Gemini, types a prompt and, suddenly, the great Ramón María del Valle-Inclán comes to digital life. The conversation flows between quotes from Luces de Bohemia and reflections on the esperpento, his signature grotesque style. The user laughs: "It described me as the hero of the esperpento". But not everything is perfect: the AI breaks character after a few exchanges, and you have to steer it back on track.
The trend of using artificial intelligence to simulate historical figures is gaining traction among digital consumers looking for more formative entertainment. The method, according to practitioners, involves "dissecting" the character in a previous conversation, feeding the AI its biography, historical context and personality traits. Then, you ask it to take on that role. The result can be fascinating... or a complete mess.
Gemini vs. the competition: who plays the part best?
The debate over which AI model is best suited to these roleplaying games has divided users. While some defend Gemini for its ability to maintain context after insisting, others call it "weak" and recommend Perplexity Pro or GPT Plus, which offer greater stability. Deepseek also comes up as an alternative, though limited to non-historical characters. The controversy reflects the current state of the industry: no AI clearly dominates the prolonged simulation of a complex personality.
The long-term memory problem
The most common recurring complaint is the loss of coherence: after a few exchanges, the AI forgets it is Valle-Inclán and answers like a generic assistant. Some users have developed tactics, such as repeating the strict-adjustment instruction or restarting the conversation. "It's like having to explain to it every day who it is", jokes a veteran. The frustration is real, but it doesn't stop the experimentation.
As long as language models keep lacking persistent memory beyond the context window, talking to the shadow of the dead will be an exercise in patience, not magic. But the demand is there: the public wants AIs that not only speak, but remember who they are. Until then, all that's left is to laugh at the esperpentos.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (10 replies).
ChatGPT's free plan limits users to three images per day, while the paid version starts at €8. Claude's intensive use plan costs €16. Explore free alternatives...
DIY paraffin mini torches burn for up to 30 minutes, but the risk of burns and the lack of a proper handle make them a controversial option. Are they wo
How much does a PC running 24 hours a day cost? 50 euros a year. Paying for a premium download account may work out cheaper. Strategies to cut your electricity bill.