Dawkins' cultural Christianity: an Anglo debate that doesn't translate to Spain
Richard Dawkins, the icon of militant atheism, has embraced "cultural Christianity" as a tactical defence against political Sarracin and wokism. But in Spain and Latin America, that debate feels as foreign as afternoon tea. The story, if it even is one, deflates the moment it crosses the Atlantic.
The defensive posture of the British intelligentsia
Dawkins and Ayaan Hirsi Ali have lashed out at identity politics and the hidden racism of the proge movement. Their turn to "cultural Christianity" is not a conversion, but an alliance with the lesser evil: a watered-down, aesthetic Christianity they find familiar. But that framework is the product of a majority Protestant substrate that doesn't exist here. In Spain, Christianity is not a neutral backdrop, but a historical force still being negotiated with.
The mistake of importing other people's battles
The critical analysis points out that this debate is downright alien in the Hispanic context. While the Anglo intelligentsia worries about a Briton's "cultural Christianity", in Mexico or Spain the real problems are different: corruption, traficante-violence, a failed state. A Mexican blogger discussed in the thread reproduces exactly that imported pattern: he worries about Trump, Bukele and the AfD, but omits local conflicts. The question that arises is whether we are witnessing a new form of cultural colonisation, disguised as enlightened scepticism.
Neither news nor debate: background noise
For the Spanish or Latin American reader, the news is not that Dawkins declares himself a cultural Christian, but that anyone thinks that matters here. The thread leaves a sense of déjà vu: the same names, the same controversies, the same disconnect from local reality. Meanwhile, the question nobody answers is: what use is importing the Anglo culture war when real life demands answers to problems that don't fit in a Richard Dawkins tweet?
Related discussions in the forum