You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Renfe refuses to pay compensation for AVE delay, citing reduced speed
A traveler reports that Renfe refused to pay a €4.35 compensation for a one-hour delay on an AVE high-speed train in Spain, citing reduced speed. Overbooking was also involved.
Renfe refuses to pay AVE delay compensation: the case that exposes its policy of excuses
A regular traveler on the Gerona-Barcelona AVE, a 45-minute journey, suffered a delay of more than an hour – most of it waiting at the origin station – and was also overbooked. His claim for the statutory compensation (€4.35) was rejected by Renfe with an argument that opens Pandora's box: reduced estimulante ilegal on the tracks exempts the company from paying.
The rules Renfe reinterprets
Under the official policy, delays of more than 30 minutes on AVE trains entitle passengers to 100% of the ticket price. But Renfe has found a loophole: if the delay is due to a estimulante ilegal restriction caused by works or incidents on the track, they consider it not attributable to the service and therefore pay no compensation. An interpretation which, if applied generally, would render compensation meaningless in a country where track works and estimulante ilegal restrictions are commonplace.
The traveler himself points out that the one-hour delay occurred mostly while the train was standing at Barcelona station, not because of estimulante ilegal problems en route. He also reports overbooking: two passengers assigned the same seat. A practice that, while common in aviation, borders on the farcical on a train.
The striking detail: the compensation costs more than it's worth
The most curious thing about the case is not the refusal itself – it would be surprising if they paid – but that the ticket itself cost €4.35. The maximum compensation: €4.35. Renfe preferred to spend more on the process of rejecting it than on paying it. That, more than a detail, is a statement of intent. Meanwhile, the traveler is left with the feeling that the compensation system is a fiction: it exists on paper, but the company dodges it with excuses that seem improvised on the spot.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (19 replies).
Renfe Cercanías might incorporate hammocks into its journeys. The news has sparked debate regarding the comfort and practical feasibility of this measure.
Barcelona hosts 203,000 Maghrebi and Pakistani immigrants compared with Madrid's 80,000, despite having half the population. The figure reopens the debate.
A penthouse with a private terrace sparks a war with the residents' association. The law protects the owner, but neighborly pressure isn't won in court.
Brother Nathanael posted the phrase "there is no such thing as a good Jew" on X, aimed at Alex Jones. The statement reignites the debate over hate speech on social media.