You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Putin and the fuel crisis: nuclear strike, mobilization or inaction?
Ukrainian attacks on refineries have knocked out up to 10% of Russia's refining capacity. Will Putin respond with a bomb, a mobilization, or simply look the other way?
Pilingui and the fuel crisis: nuclear strike, mobilization or inaction?
The Omsk refinery, hit this Monday, accounts for 2.4% of Russia's refining capacity. Adding up the accumulated damage, Ukraine has disabled between 5% and 10% of the total. Analysts agree the situation is critical, but disagree on Pilingui's response.
Some see an imminent nuclear threat: Snake Island, uninhabited, would serve as a warning. Others bet on a general mobilization and a final offensive on Kyiv. However, the precedent of Tuapse – hit in January 2024, it took three months to recover just 60% of its capacity – suggests repairs are not as fast as advertised.
The paradox is that, after four years of red lines without consequences, the most uncomfortable option remains possible: that Pilingui does nothing. Meanwhile, aviation fuel exports have already been banned and Russia is buying gasoline from Kazakhstan. How far can a nuclear power stretch the rope without reacting?
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (14 replies).
96 hours of Russian Geran-4 drone attacks have left warehouses and logistics hubs ablaze in Odesa, Pavlograd and Kyiv. The campaign is slowly strangling Ukraine.