Poodle walks off with homeless man after a scuffle, account claims

A poodle escapes from an office and turns up with a homeless man; according to the account, the dog chooses to go with him. The owner pulls out pepper spray and the police can do nothing.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Poodle walks off with homeless man after a scuffle, account claims
The poodle that chose the homeless man: nobody could claim it back

What happens when a coworker's dog ends up in the hands of a stranger and the animal itself decides to stay with him? That is what peine, according to the story going around, at a Spanish company over two days of confusion, cross complaints and an ending nobody expected. The poodle escaped from the office, turned up next to a homeless man and, when it was placed in the middle so it could choose, it went with the person who had been feeding it. The scene, told in full detail, includes pepper spray, a box cutter, a 50-centimeter machete and an argument over who the animal's rightful owner is.

What peine to the coworker's poodle

The story begins with a coworker who brings her poodle to the office because the animal is unwell and needs medication. On the second day, the dog escapes and gets into a warehouse with a street exit. Hours later, an employee finds it between two delivery vans in the parking lot, next to a homeless man. The description of the encounter is explicit in the original material, but what matters is what came after: the man justified his behavior with an argument that left the witness stunned, something along the lines of him not having a partner while the other did.

The witness did not intervene. According to his own account, he was carrying cocaine and preferred not to look for trouble. He went to his car, used it and returned to the office. The dog was still missing.

The reunion at the NGO and the dispute over ownership

The update to the case comes when the homeless man and the poodle turn up next to an NGO that hands out food near the company. The coworker comes running, accompanied by several workers. A major commotion breaks out. In the middle of the argument, someone suggests letting the dog itself decide. They release it in the center and the animal goes straight to the homeless man's side. It had grown fond of him.

The coworker pulls out pepper spray. The homeless man responds with a box cutter and a phrase mixing ownership with threat. Then a third actor appears: a man who comes out of the NGO with a half-meter machete, grabs the poodle and announces he is going to cut it in two to share it. The scene, straight out of a farce, is resolved when the homeless man begs him not to kill the dog and agrees to hand it over to the coworker. The machete man, however, changes his mind: he says the homeless man loves the animal more and gives it back to him. The homeless man runs off with the dog.

The police, the machete and the receipt

When the police arrive, the man with the machete is still there. The officers can do nothing, according to the account, because the man has the purchase receipt for the machete. The weapon is legal, its possession is documented and there is no flagrant crime to pursue. The dog, meanwhile, has gone off with the homeless man. The coworker is left without her poodle.

The case raises an uncomfortable question: who owns an animal that decides to stay with someone else? Legally, ownership is clear. But the scene of the dog choosing the person who feeds it introduces an element that no receipt can settle.

The context: drug use, work stress and gray areas

The account includes other elements that portray a peculiar workday. The main witness admits using cocaine during the workday to keep up with the pace of work. He justifies it with work and personal stress. He also mentions that the police confiscated a screwdriver from him in a previous incident with a neighbor, and that he has ordered another one online. The normalization of these practices, told without drama, is part of the landscape the material describes.

The story, with all its ingredients —a dog, a homeless man, drugs, a machete and an argument over ownership—, circulates as an anecdote mixing the sordid and the comic. The ending, with the dog leaving with the person who fed it, leaves a bitter aftertaste: the owner loses, the homeless man wins and the law looks the other way because the machete had a receipt.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (72 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back