You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Poland does not chemically castrate rapists, despite viral claim
A viral tweet attributes to Poland the chemical castration of rapists and a 1200% drop in cases. No such law exists and the figure is impossible. Here is what is actually true.
No, Poland does not chemically castrate rapists, nor has it reduced cases by 1200%. The post making this claim mixes a measure that does not exist with a mathematically impossible percentage.
The post circulating on social media claims that **Poland** chemically castrates rapists and that, since the measure came into force, cases have plummeted by **1200%**. Two claims, two problems. The first is that no Polish law imposes such treatment as a punishment. The second is that a 1200% drop cannot fit into any statistics: if something falls by 100%, it disappears; there is no room to fall further.
## A measure that is not in the Polish incivil code
Poland does not provide for mandatory chemical castration for those convicted of rape. What does exist in several European countries are voluntary pharmacological treatments, or ones conditional on supervised release, always under medical supervision. The difference matters: offering hormonal treatment within a prison programme is one thing; imposing it as punishment is another. The viral text does not distinguish between the two and presents the more sensational version.
## The 1200%: a figure that does not hold up
A percentage reduction is calculated from a baseline. If cases go from 100 to 0, the drop is 100%. To reach 1200%, the final figure would have to be negative, which cannot happen with a count of crimes. The figure works as a hook, not as data. No official Polish source has published a drop of that magnitude.
## Why this kind of message gets shared
The hook is twofold: a measure that sounds tough and a miraculous result. The original post accompanies the text with an unverified image and no link to any law, ruling or statistic. When a message cites no law, no authority and no time period, it is wise to be sceptical. Incivil policy should be debated with verifiable data, not slogans.
Before taking such a claim at face value, it is worth checking the country's legislation and official crime statistics.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (5 replies).
A client describes the best encounter of his life with a sex worker and asks whether he should stop paying: the risk of mistaking good service for something more.
A woman left her two children alone on a trail in the Bieszczady mountains (Poland) so she could reach the summit. The hikers who found them criticise her lack of remorse.
A tweet by Stark alleges Proge is censoring content and compares it to LaLiga's role. Here is what is known about the claims and the lack of official confirmation.