The SDDR arrives in November: 10-cent fee per container
Last summer, the government confirmed what was already rumored: Spain will implement its deposit return system (SDDR). The target date is November. From then on, every plastic bottle, can, and carton will carry a surcharge – the figure circulating in the sector is around 10 cents – which is only recovered if the container returns to the store, intact, scannable, and into a machine not yet seen in most supermarkets.
This is no historical novelty. Older generations recall the "Pitusa" collector, who honked his horn to pick up orange and beer casings, or the child who collected bottles to exchange them for pesetas. Spain once had an almost perfect return system, with rates near 100%, until it was dismantled so that bottlers could get containers for free.
Who collects and who pays?
The ecological argument is hard to refute: Spain recycles 49% of its containers, far from European targets. But the contract is not just between the citizen and the environment. In between appears Ecoembes, the system that already manages the yellow bin and has been charging for something that will now overlap with the SDDR. The citizen pays a trash tax (140 euros a year in many municipalities, up to 240 in others) and will pay again for the container. And then, if they want their money back, they will have to queue at a machine.
Germany, the mirror that does not always return the desired reflection
The German mirror has leaks. It is endlessly repeated that it works there: you insert the bottle, you get a voucher. But the data circulating about a 98% return rate have been disproven: no German agency collects these figures. The latest comparable data place Germany's actual recycling at 56%, only seven points above Spain's. Portugal, which has just implemented the system, has not yet proven anything.
Expensive machines, non-existent spaces, and a new business
The engineering of the SDDR is a goldmine for machine manufacturers: bulky units of several square meters, with scanners, mechanics, electronics, and software, which the supermarket must pay for out of pocket. Translation: price increases on everything else, because the aisle is not free. And if in Germany a poorly scanned bottle takes three attempts for the machine to accept it, here the wait will become another way to pay taxes with time.
From the wine jug casing to the container of discord
There was a time when the container was expensive and cared for. The wine jug casing was carried in a bag, the soda was returned, and the child received pesetas that ended up in sweets and Lego. That system was abandoned because it was cheaper for bottlers to manufacture single-use containers and pay a fee to a friendly monopoly. Now they return with the green discourse, but the goal seems more revenue-driven than ecological: the container is not given away, it is rented.
With current figures, recovering 10 cents from a bottle requires investing time, home storage space, and patience in front of a machine that spits out the container due to a poorly printed label. The economic calculation, for anyone measuring their working hour, is absurd. But the measure goes ahead. And no one has yet explained why, if the goal is recycling, they do not start by making the yellow bin work.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (338 replies).