Paco and Jalil: A 70-Year-Old Retiree and a 21-Year-Old Student Share a Flat

Paco and Jalil: When Sharing a Flat Brings Together a 70-Year-Old Retiree and a 21-Year-Old

Paco was 70, had a 70-square-metre house in Burgos and no children. Jalil was 18, had just arrived from Tangier and was looking for a place to sleep. An Intergenerational Approach programme between people over 60 and university students brought them together on 5 September 2021. On the first day, Paco gave him the keys and went on holiday to Islantilla for a week. "He didn't know me at all and he welcomed me that way," the young man recalls.

The story, published in El Mundo and later spread on social media, has sparked a debate that goes far beyond two people. Because the case touches three nerves at once: unwanted loneliness among the elderly, the problem of access to housing for university students and the public policy of intergenerational cohabitation.

What is the Burgos Intergenerational Approach Programme?

The programme is coordinated by social worker Lourdes Bustamante and connects people over 60 with university students who need accommodation. Paco found out about it through the University of Experience in Burgos. He set only one condition: that whoever came spoke good Spanish. Jalil had spoken it almost since birth.

The profiles of the two protagonists are almost a sociological experiment. Paco is the son of a farmer, a poor student, started working at 14 in a transport agency and ended up as a road worker painting bridges. He took early retirement at 61. He never had a partner or children. Jalil is the son of a bank manager in Tangier and an HR manager, studied at the Ramón y Cajal Spanish School, speaks four languages and is studying Occupational Therapy in Burgos. He has no relationship with his father.

Unwanted Loneliness and the Price of Housing: The Two Underlying Problems

The original article provides the data that underpins the whole story: up to 20% of Spaniards suffer from unwanted loneliness, and more than eight million people are over 65, one in five of whom lives alone. At the same time, young people struggle to find accommodation. The programme does not solve either structural problem, but it patches both at once.

In the subsequent debate, some participants argue that such initiatives are pure institutional marketing and that this particular case was chosen for its symbolic value. Another current defends that the programme works precisely because it is not massive: it relies on prior selection and monitoring by a social worker. The coordinator herself has told other cases, such as that of a student with schizophrenia who was given a chance despite the health requirements.

The Official Narrative vs. Reader Distrust

Many of the responses to the article do not question Paco or Jalil, but the framework in which the story is presented. Some read propaganda where others see a friendly chronicle. It is argued that the media choose this type of story to construct a specific image of cohabitation and that they rarely return to tell how it all ended. The most repeated example is that of a German couple who took in refugees in 2015 and were never heard from again.

There is also the suspicion that the young man has a privileged profile — son of a bank executive, four languages, elite school — and that this dismantles the reading of "vulnerable young man taken in by humble retiree". The article itself makes it clear: Jalil did not arrive in Burgos fleeing anything; he came because his grades were not enough for Psychology or Nutrition and he was accepted for Occupational Therapy.

What the Data on the Table Actually Says

The available material allows us to establish several points. Paco was 70 and Jalil 21 at the time of publication, in December 2024. The house is 70 square metres. The cohabitation began on 5 September 2021. The programme requires that the participant's health does not pose a risk to cohabitation. And the relationship has lasted more than three years, including a joint alucinación to Tangier the previous summer.

Paco summed it up with a phrase the article quotes: "He's the closest thing I'll ever have to a son." Jalil, for his part, had no father to compare with. The symbiosis, as the report itself called it, needed no further explanation.

---

What does not appear in any headline is what usually decides these stories: what happens when the student graduates, finds a job in another city or simply no longer needs the room. The programme does not say. The article does not either.