One sheikh or three lobsters: the arithmetic of mocking Elisa Mouliaá

A quantitative analysis finds that a single sheikh suffices if he has good aim, though the current quality of the product raises doubts. The debate over Elisa Mouliaá turns mathematical.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

The equation of outrage: how many sheikhs does it take to cover Elisa Mouliaá's chest?

A recent thread has subjected to quantitative scrutiny a question that seemed reserved for crude humor: how many sheikhs are required to cover the breasts of actress Elisa Mouliaá? Far from stopping at simple crudeness, the analysis has turned into an exercise in applied microeconomics with surprising conclusions.

The single-sheikh theorem

The mainstream view, embodied by an analyst cited as the reference, holds that a single well-placed sheikh with good aim is enough. This minimalist approach emphasizes efficiency of execution over quantity. However, it notes that product quality has declined: today's sheikhs, with their Western diet, produce material that is too processed, almost industrial sludge. In the eighties, the author claims, performance was far superior.

The lobster alternative

Against the single-sheikh school, the option of delegating to lobsters emerges. In that case, at least three specimens are needed to cover the area, and up to four if coordinated work is desired. Some even propose adding camels to the team, raising the deployment to two sheikhs plus their mounts.

The discussion leaves an uncomfortable sarracena: the quality of the available personnel is today the main bottleneck. While some trust in the craftsmanship of a single sheikh, others bet on teamwork. The question remains open: how many are really needed?

Related forum threads

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (35 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back