The crude oil battle: between reserve releases and supply collapse
While official headlines insist that the IEA's release of strategic reserves will stabilise oil prices, more than 150 dollars per barrel is already being paid in real market auctions. The gap between the narrative and reality points to a scenario that, for many, can only end in rationing.
The release effect: a patch lasting days
The IEA authorised member countries to release their strategic reserves. Spain, in particular, put 11 million barrels on the market (not 2 as initially reported), sold at market price. The official argument: they were bought cheap and sold dear, even generating a small accounting profit. But the impact lasts days: 11 million barrels barely cover one week's consumption. They do not solve the underlying problem: global supply is strangled.
The real market: auctions at $150 and rationing
While the official crude price remains at high but controlled levels, sources indicate that actual purchases on the free market are being closed at more than 150 dollars per barrel. The official quotation would be a fiction, a price imposed on captive producers. On top of this, the United States cannot increase its shale production (in decline), Venezuela is not pumping more, and Russia is already selling all its oil. The Strait of Hormuz, key for Asia, is at the centre of the storm. Only 7% of the oil the US imports passes through there, but for Australia the dependence is total, and a recent article warns it has one month left before rationing.
The conclusion of the debate is clear: those betting on a moderate rise trust in the reserves and in the IEA's ability to contain panic. Those who see disaster point out that the supply fundamentals cannot deliver more, and that the reserve release is a patch that does not stop the haemorrhage. The question left hanging: will we see petrol at 3 euros a litre before summer?
Related discussions in the forum