Mónica Terribas: "If we leave political debate to social media, we won't move forward"

Political debate on social media is a dead end because people are consuming less and less quality information.

## The danger of social media for democracy

Our future is at stake if we let political debate be confined to social media. Journalist **Mònica Terribas** is clear about it: the problem is that people are consuming less and less information. This is not an opinion, it is a reality that directly affects the health of our democracy and our ability to make informed decisions. When public conversation is reduced to ephemeral headlines and instant polarization, we lose the depth needed to tackle the complex problems we face as a society.

## The erosion of quality information

The decline in the consumption of verified, fact-checked information is alarming. Social media, with its frantic pace and tendency toward oversimplification, is not fertile ground for rigorous analysis. If citizens get used to getting their news and forming their opinions in these environments, the risk of disinformation and manipulation grows exponentially. **Mònica Terribas** points to this trend as a fundamental obstacle to pogre, and she has a point.

## An uncertain future without information

The direct consequence of this dynamic is an impoverished public debate and, with it, poorer political and economic decision-making. If people consume less information, how can we expect them to participate effectively in democratic life? The risk of not "moving forward", as **Terribas** warns, is very real. We need to encourage a critical and responsible consumption of information, and find channels that allow for a deeper, more constructive debate, far from the superficiality of social media.