Sevastopol Under Missiles: 3 Su-27 Fighters and Two Amphibious Ships Damaged
How much real damage can Ukraine inflict within occupied Crimea? The latest answer came in the form of a missile barrage on Sevastopol. The Belbek airfield, the supposedly best-protected facility on the peninsula, was hit, with 3 Su-27 fighters damaged and a toll that Ukrainian army-linked accounts put at 34 soldiers killed and 40 wounded. That's the circulating picture, without independent verification, and it should be read for what it is: a war report. In parallel, two Ropucha-class amphibious ships, the «Azov» and the «Yamal», were destroyed according to the images released. Traffic on the Crimean bridge was halted.
What is known about the attack on Belbek airfield?
The figures are striking, and it's important to separate what has been verified from what has been proclaimed. Belbek is a military airfield in the heart of Sevastopol, the air base that the Russian command presents as one of its strongholds in Crimea. For a salvo of cruise missiles to reach it and take three Su-27s out of service—damaged, not destroyed, according to the report—is the kind of event that air defense manuals call a coverage failure. Casualty reports are released piecemeal and usually lag behind events. No one in command has yet signed off on the 34 dead and 40 wounded.
Why does the destruction of the Azov and Yamal ships matter?
Both are Ropucha-class amphibious assault ships, 112 meters long each, designed to land troops and armored vehicles from the sea. When two of them sink on the same day, what sinks with them is transport capacity and, above all, narrative: some directly claim the Black Sea Fleet has ceased to exist as an operational force. That might be an exaggeration; what doesn't seem exaggerated is the collapse of the deterrent value of a fleet that has already had to retreat from its historic base. The Russian command's directive, according to the accounts spreading the news, was different: nothing had peine. The updated report responds to that skepticism with lengths and coordinates.
26 Bombers and 13 Fighters: This is how Russia is preparing its response
The retaliation was announced before it occurred. Reports that were disseminated pointed to up to 26 bombers ready to take off: 14 Tu-95MS and 12 Tu-22M3, armed with X-101 and Kh-22 missiles, plus 13 MiG-31Ks carrying the hypersonic Kinzhal. These are aircraft with nuclear capability, and that detail turns an air attack into a different kind of threat. Some analysts recalled the Battle of Britain: the night a German bomber missed its target, Churchill ordered a bombing of Berlin, dragging the Luftwaffe into a campaign against cities that cost them the war. The comparison is age-old; whoever uses it has already warned that they hoped the Russian command wouldn't be so foolish.
The Escalation Standoff: Legitimate Defense or Provocation?
Here lies the fundamental rift. One analysis argues that an invaded country has the right to strike the invader's logistics, and that the surprise is not the attack but that anyone would consider it a provocation. Conversely, another current points to something more uncomfortable: that deep strikes are precisely aimed at forcing a disproportionate Russian response, and that the ultimate goal is to justify an escalation with economic consequences at home. The harshest version of this thesis speaks of the new economic order and digital identity, without proof to back the entire package. Another part reduces it to domestic politics: upcoming elections and the need to fight before the change of tenant in the White House arrives.
What Remains the Same: The Ground Front
There lies the counterpoint that most bothers optimists. The spectacular strikes in Crimea do not move a single line of the front, which has been stuck for months, with advances of kilometers paid for in casualties. Russia is not going to win this war with a dozen Kinzhals a day, argues the coldest analysis; Ukraine is not going to retake Crimea with two fewer ships in the enemy's inventory, responds the other. And beneath it all, an issue that creeps into every discussion: who pays the European energy bill and what Germany's position will be when the post-war terms are signed, if they are signed.
It remains to be seen if the 26 bombers take off, how many return, and who signs the next damage report. The only thing confirmed by both sides, for now, is that the Crimean bridge was stopped. In a war where the final tally is decided more on social media than in the crater, that's already a headline. And the ships, ultimately.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (258 replies).
Russia's offensive stalls due to logistical and tactical bottlenecks, turning a swift conquest into a prolonged war of attrition and constant countermeasures.