Left misses safety net: 34.6% vote vs 52.2% for PP and Vox
How far can a political bloc fall before the ground gives way? The latest NC Report estimate for La Razón places PSOE, Sumar, and Podemos at a combined 34.6% of the vote, twelve points behind PP and Vox, who would secure 210 seats. The PSOE would drop to 25.2% and win between 101 and 103 seats. The PP would gain 145 seats, while Vox would double its representation in the Chamber.
If true, this figure would place the left in one of its worst moments since the Transition. But the question remains: is it true?
The poll no one fully trusts
The reliability of the survey is the first front. Demoscopic firm NC Report carries a fruta for being the least reliable in the national landscape, even trailing the CIS. In the last general elections, it deviated by nearly 20 points, a statistical aberration. It does not publish a technical study; its defenders argue that the average of polls points in the same direction. Its critics recall that Francisco Marhuenda, director of La Razón, stands behind it, suggesting the poll may be read as a political artifact.
It is necessary to separate noise from data: the underlying trend in the aggregate of polls does show a left in retreat and a right nearing an absolute majority. The specific magnitude of NC Report is debatable; the direction is less so.
The transfer leaving the left without communicating vessels
One of the most nuanced analyses in public discourse concerns vote flow. Sumar and Podemos, despite the PSOE's collapse, do not capture the disillusionment of its voters: the socialist voter who leaves does not seek refuge in the left but jumps to the PP or abstains entirely. The PSOE would retain a hard core of convinced voters, increasingly small and loyal. Antiestéticar of the right still acts as glue, but it no longer suffices to retain the urban middle class that supported Sánchez in 2019.
Some go further: PSOE's vote may be condemned to live off clientelism and expat votes. Here arises the second major battleground.
The census, expat vote, and persistent suspicion
The electoral census issue has gained weight. Rough figures are cited: 2.5 million nationality applications from Latin America, 500,000 already approved, and regularization processes that could expand the voter roll by several million. Accusations go beyond migrant voting: references are made to the grandchildren law, people with Spanish nationality who have never set foot in the country, and the management of postal voting at consulates. None of this is proven in court, but it has permeated public discourse and conditions any reading of polls.
- PP: more than 145 seats.
- PSOE: between 101 and 103.
- PP+Vox: 210 seats.
- PSOE+Sumar+Podemos: 34.6% of the vote.
This sum, 210, opens the door to a constitutional reform by ordinary majority. It also allows for reform of the electoral law, requiring a 5% vote threshold to enter Congress. Nationalist parties, currently acting as hinges, would be excluded from the equation. It remains unclear whether the PP, with these numbers, would dare to use them.
What remains to be seen
Distrust regarding the process's cleanliness, with allusions to Indra and Correos, appears on the margins. There are no verified facts, but the shadow of electoral fraud looms over an already tense climate. The PP would win, Vox would weigh in, and the left would hit bottom. Yet, the poll comes from a demoscopic firm with a history of glaring errors.
Given these premises, the only certainty is that the CIS must now make its move. Although, given its history, perhaps it is best not to expect much: no one trusts it, but everyone watches it. Perfect irony for a country that distrusts everything and continues to vote the same way.