July Mail-In Voting Under Suspicion of Electoral Fraud
An undelivered envelope, a post office on the brink of collapse, and a question echoing through public debate: what if the result of the July 23rd election is already written before counting begins? Calling a general election in the height of summer, with half the country on vacation and the postal system strained, has turned mail-in voting into the epicenter of conspiracy theories. Some see the date as a deliberate choice. Others see mere incompetence. And some argue that the entire system is theater.
Why July and Mail-In Voting Raise So Many Suspicions
The most repeated argument is one of coincidence: holding elections during the peak vacation month, when millions are away from home, pushes many to vote by mail. Unlike in-person voting, mail-in ballots pass through third-party hands. This is the root of distrust, even though no proof of manipulation has been provided.
There are, however, data on the ground. There are reports of one million forced abstentions due to late-arriving ballots, Correos staff refusing en masse to extend hours or work weekends, and reinforcements failing to compensate for vacations approved months earlier. The result: envelopes left in limbo. Those who claim it’s all a setup find their best ammunition here. Defenders of the institution argue that logistical collapse is not the same as fraud.
The Galicia Precedent and the Argument That Debunks the Theory
Against the narrative of planned fraud comes the most uncomfortable objection: if the trick were so easy, why wasn’t it used in local elections? Why wasn’t it used in Galicia, which also voted in July? Skeptics answer that rigging an election isn’t about stealing ballot boxes, but something more subtle: inflating a party’s support enough so it doesn’t need coalition partners to dictate its agenda. In other words, giving the PP more votes so they don’t have to pact with VOX.
This hypothesis aligns with another circulating strongly: that the PSOE campaign is so bad, so clumsy, that it’s hard to believe it’s unintentional. The “Txapote” slogan sounding day and night, aligned media taking the rival’s side in debates... Everything points, according to this reading, to a wide-margin victory for the PP. And if the PP wins with margin, they govern alone. If they govern alone, there’s no leverage.
The Theater Thesis: VOX as the System’s Safety Valve
At the radical extreme of the analysis is the idea that none of this matters because the game is rigged from the start. VOX wouldn’t be the alternative, but the safety valve designed to capture discontent and return it to the fold. It is argued that the party is the most pro-Israel in Spain, that its role as the “new right” fits what certain international leaders announced long ago, and that its real function is decorative opposition.
The response to this thesis is equally forceful: if VOX were a puppet, why do other parties ally to isolate it? Why is it treated like the devil? The system doesn’t need to manufacture opposition: it generates it naturally. Meanwhile, abstention grows. Not voting, say some, is the only way not to legitimize anything. Others respond that not voting means voting for the status quo.
The Scenario No One Rules Out: New Elections in Autumn
With polls giving the PP a win but without a majority sufficient to govern alone, and the PSOE refusing to facilitate investiture, a repeat election in autumn appears as the most likely outcome. It’s the perfect paradox: the fraud blamed on the PSOE could end up benefiting the PP, and the PP could end up unable to govern. Meanwhile, streets don’t burn. Right-wing voters, it is said, are tame and unrevolutionary.
And here comes the disorienting fact. More than a century ago, an Austro-Hungarian immigrant named Erik Weisz became famous in the United States for escaping shackles and chains. His trick, like that of all magicians, consisted of making you look at one hand while the work peine in the other. The PP will get 160 seats and won’t pact with VOX, says the prophecy. And while everyone looks at the fraud, someone moves the other hand.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (123 replies).