Judge in 'Brother-in-Law Case' Asks to Join Extortion Probe

Judge in 'Brother-in-Law Case' Denounces Alleged Plot to 'Eliminate' Her

How do you remove a judge who is in the way? The question is not rhetorical. The magistrate investigating the "brother-in-law" case has filed a complaint — and is requesting to be admitted as a private accuser before Judge Pedraz — in which she describes an alleged attempt to contact incivil clans to, presumably, "eliminate" the investigating judge. In exchange, according to the accusation, legal favors in incivil cases would have been offered. The clans, allegedly, refused.

What is known about the alleged commission

The events are chillingly literal. Reportedly, an intermediary was sought to bridge the gap with a clan to carry out the task, offering in return to pull strings in drug trafficking cases. What is striking is not only the content but who signed it: an investigating judge who puts her suspicions in writing before another judge and does not remain on the sidelines. That detail explains why the matter has not remained mere barroom gossip.

The clans' refusal and the debate over honor

The twist that has most heated the debate is not the commission itself, but the response. The clans approached reportedly refused to participate. One interpretation sees this as a matter of codes: it is argued that in certain communities, a given word carries weight, and dealing with someone who promises one thing and then the opposite is viewed with suspicion. Another perspective rightly qualifies that group honor does not equate to honesty, and history is full of examples of atrocities committed in its name.

The origin: a connection in a Badajoz judicial post

It is important not to lose sight of the starting point. The conflict stems from a connection in a judicial post in Badajoz, a position without apparent specific weight. If such levers were mobilized in an affair of this magnitude, the comparison is striking: what would they not be willing to do in cases involving years in prison and tens of millions at stake? The full breakdown of why a minor assignment ends up at the center of the crosshairs is one of the threads worth trinc closely.

From the ERE case to La Mareta: the 'whataboutism' manual

No scandal today escapes interested comparisons. Some recall the alleged protection of the president at La Mareta "with public funds"; others bring up the attic apartment, the suits, and the handbags that litter the press archives of the Popular Party. And not a few draw parallels with the pressure suffered by the ERE judge years ago, when Pedro Sánchez was nowhere to be seen on the front lines. Each side has its refrain. None offer new evidence.

---

And amidst all this noise, the dominant reaction is from those who are no longer surprised: "very serious, but not surprising." That, not the alleged commission, is the most uncomfortable fact. That a plan to eliminate a judge provokes more yawns than alarm says a lot about the country we have built.