Jenni Hermoso Complaints Reach Spain's High Court
Law firm files complaint against Jenni Hermoso with two prosecutors' offices; case moves to National High Court amid lack of clarity on accusers or allegations.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Complaint Against Jenni Hermoso: Prosecutor's Office Refers Case to High Court
A law firm filed a complaint against Jennifer Hermoso with the State Attorney General's Office and the Madrid Prosecutor's Office in late August. The Madrid office accepted it and forwarded it to the National High Court. This is the core of the matter. Everything else—who filed it, what the charges are, why the case is moving jurisdictions—remains publicly unaddressed. The exclusive was published by EDATV on Wednesday, August 30th, in the afternoon, and subsequent coverage, critics argue, omitted the essential details: the names of the complainants and the basis of the accusation.
Who Is Complaining and Why the News Doesn't Clarify
Regarding the complaints, the form is known: a law firm, two prosecutor's offices, and a waiting period. The content is unknown. Without knowing whether it concerns defamation, slander, or another charge, any prediction about its outcome is speculative. Some argue that the logical route would have been for Rubiales himself to formalize it, as slander is not a public offense; however, the fact that he is not initiating the procedure works against this.
A underlying suspicion also lingers: that the initiative stems from political spheres rather than a genuine legal interest. This is a hypothesis, not a proven fact. What is a fact is the recurring paradox in the analysis: the player has barely spoken and already faces two fronts.
The Kiss, Consent, and the Shifting Narrative
The core of the dispute is not the kiss. It's about what it signified. One line of analysis suggests that subsequent videos and audio recordings depict a consensual episode, emphasizing that Hermoso's initial statements were downplaying, before shifting towards an assault narrative. The opposing view responds that the perception of abuse can solidify over time and that pressure from her environment is a factor. Both interpretations circulate as possibilities, without a firm resolution to settle them.
Some have even broken down, point by point, the hypothetical press conference that would de-escalate the case: five sequential concessions that, most likely, will never happen.
FUTPRO, AFE, and the Union Rivalry No One Sees
Beneath the media noise lies a union conflict that almost no one has examined. The union that has defended the player was founded by two footballers who resigned from the national team, and it faces a complaint from the employers' union AFE for alleged malpractice in pressuring teammates who did attend the call-up. The kiss, viewed this way, would be the tip of an internal dispute that predated it.
The 80% Without Conviction and the Unjustified Leap
A figure is repeatedly mentioned in the debate: 80% of gender violence complaints do not result in a conviction. From this, a conclusion is drawn that most are false. This leap is not supported: a procedure without a conviction can fail due to lack of evidence, withdrawal, agreement, or a different legal classification. The figure is used; the inference is not. And this is precisely the ground where the case has become political ammunition.
Rubiales's 90 Days
As the complaint proceeds, the former RFEF president is serving the 90-day ban imposed on him for this matter. The question on many Spaniards' minds is the usual one: if the case fades from the news, does he return? No one knows. The prosecutor's office holds the ball. The player has 15 days to make a move, according to the current timeline. And the rest? Expectation.
With the complaint now before the National High Court and with neither the signatory nor the basis yet known, the case remains exactly where the kiss left it: up in the air.
A law firm filed a complaint against Jennifer Hermoso with the State Attorney General's Office and the Madrid Prosecutor's Office in late August. The Madrid office accepted it and forwarded it to the National High Court. This is the core of the matter. Everything else—who filed it, what the charges are, why the case is moving jurisdictions—remains publicly unaddressed. The exclusive was published by EDATV on Wednesday, August 30th, in the afternoon, and subsequent coverage, critics argue, omitted the essential details: the names of the complainants and the basis of the accusation.
Who Is Complaining and Why the News Doesn't Clarify
Regarding the complaints, the form is known: a law firm, two prosecutor's offices, and a waiting period. The content is unknown. Without knowing whether it concerns defamation, slander, or another charge, any prediction about its outcome is speculative. Some argue that the logical route would have been for Rubiales himself to formalize it, as slander is not a public offense; however, the fact that he is not initiating the procedure works against this.
A underlying suspicion also lingers: that the initiative stems from political spheres rather than a genuine legal interest. This is a hypothesis, not a proven fact. What is a fact is the recurring paradox in the analysis: the player has barely spoken and already faces two fronts.
The Kiss, Consent, and the Shifting Narrative
The core of the dispute is not the kiss. It's about what it signified. One line of analysis suggests that subsequent videos and audio recordings depict a consensual episode, emphasizing that Hermoso's initial statements were downplaying, before shifting towards an assault narrative. The opposing view responds that the perception of abuse can solidify over time and that pressure from her environment is a factor. Both interpretations circulate as possibilities, without a firm resolution to settle them.
Some have even broken down, point by point, the hypothetical press conference that would de-escalate the case: five sequential concessions that, most likely, will never happen.
FUTPRO, AFE, and the Union Rivalry No One Sees
Beneath the media noise lies a union conflict that almost no one has examined. The union that has defended the player was founded by two footballers who resigned from the national team, and it faces a complaint from the employers' union AFE for alleged malpractice in pressuring teammates who did attend the call-up. The kiss, viewed this way, would be the tip of an internal dispute that predated it.
The 80% Without Conviction and the Unjustified Leap
A figure is repeatedly mentioned in the debate: 80% of gender violence complaints do not result in a conviction. From this, a conclusion is drawn that most are false. This leap is not supported: a procedure without a conviction can fail due to lack of evidence, withdrawal, agreement, or a different legal classification. The figure is used; the inference is not. And this is precisely the ground where the case has become political ammunition.
Rubiales's 90 Days
As the complaint proceeds, the former RFEF president is serving the 90-day ban imposed on him for this matter. The question on many Spaniards' minds is the usual one: if the case fades from the news, does he return? No one knows. The prosecutor's office holds the ball. The player has 15 days to make a move, according to the current timeline. And the rest? Expectation.
With the complaint now before the National High Court and with neither the signatory nor the basis yet known, the case remains exactly where the kiss left it: up in the air.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (253 replies).
More summaries
-
Euthanasia in Old Age: Autonomy vs. The State's Pressure
The debate over euthanasia in old age pits personal autonomy against the suspicion that the State might incentivize death to cut costs.
-
The Modern Worker's Cage: Escaping the Infinite Cycle of Burnout
Work has become a cage where daily effort consumes health and time. Discover why we push ourselves so hard and how to break the cycle.
-
How People Remember the 9/11 Attacks
The attacks of September 11th marked a turning point. Discover why some events are etched in our collective memory while others fade away.
-
Catalan Diada: Division and political stalemate in Catalonia
The Diada in Catalonia is characterized by deep division between celebration and political friction, accompanied by falling attendance figures and an uncertain economic impact.
-
Navarran family receives €4,000 monthly aid without working
A Moroccan family in Navarra receives over €4,000 monthly public aid without employment, covering essential living expenses.
-
Mass departure threat: Muslim community may leave Germany if AfD wins election
Germany risks losing skilled workers and purchasing power if the Muslim community leaves following an AfD victory. We analyze the economic implications.