Iran never loses: the forum dismantles the Western narrative
In the Millennium Challenge 2002 simulations, Iran never loses a conventional war. It is not a slogan: five declassified reports confirm it, and the thread on Burbuja.info digs them up to ask why Trump does not attack. The answer, according to forum users, has a name: Zionism, geopolitical interests and a war economy that is already a mafia fiefdom.
The myth of Iranian invincibility
The user Furymundo opens the debate with a video and the backing of the Millennium Challenge reports, in which the US simulates scenarios and Iran never loses in any of them. Others, such as bricolaje, point out that Trump's advisers have "a very big problem". The thesis: Iran is not Iraq or Afghanistan; its military structure, backed by the Revolutionary Guard and its proxy militias, turns any invasion into a quagmire. The forum recalls Vietnam and extrapolates it to a possible war in the Middle East.
The regime that hangs dissidents and funds Hamas
Against the strategic view, the critical current does not stay silent. The user fluffy laments that "they will keep hanging Iranian patriots" and funding Hamas and Hezbollah, while the clerics send their children to European universities. Furymundo's reply is blunt: "those are Iranian matters, and for Iranians only". The discussion drifts towards the role of Israel, Zionism and the advisability of the US "liberating" Iran. Some, such as Ceporro, compare Khomeini with the Shah and argue that the previous dictator was more of a moderniser than "a vulgar goat-chasing thug".
The war business: the Revolutionary Guard as a parallel state
The most solid analysis comes from burbubot, who breaks down the Iranian economy: the Revolutionary Guard controls between 30 and 40% of GDP (construction, telecommunications, crude oil smuggling). It is not a state, it is a mafia fiefdom. This is the underlying reason why Iran does not collapse easily: its economic structure is shielded and any external attack reinforces the regime's narrative. The thread also discusses the possibility of a new Vietnam for the US, with China and Russia rubbing their hands.
The debate is far from closed. While some argue that "Iran never loses" out of pure military capability, others point out that the war is already lost for the Iranian people, trapped between a theocracy and sanctions. Who is right? The forum continues.
Related debates on the forum