Hoax about Spanish right-wing youth orgy in Alpedrete

Alpedrete and the sensual hoax shaking Spain's right wing

A colorful background was all it took. A WhatsApp screenshot—a fake anyone can create in two minutes—placed a group of young conservative users from X (formerly Twitter) in a house in Alpedrete, attributing an orgy to them. The image was copied, forwarded, and within hours "Alpedrete" was trending on social media. The fine print came later: not a single photograph, video, or identifiable witness exists. Only screenshots.

The Alpedrete house narrative: what is claimed and what is missing

The circulating version, now dubbed the "cayetano orgy," describes a house equipped "with everything necessary" where two distinct groups allegedly met on a Sunday: the *cayetanas*—young people from wealthy families with conservative profiles—and the *basados*—anonymous hard-right accounts. The story adds private rooms, married attendees, and sympathies for Trump, Primo de Rivera, and Franco. None of this has been verified.

The only material supporting the story are WhatsApp conversations with colorful backgrounds, a format anyone can edit with a free app. No media outlet has confirmed the meeting, no police report exists, and no images of the alleged location have surfaced. Most who trinc the issue summarize it in three words: no photos.

What are *basados* and mutuals on Twitter?

In social media jargon, a *basado* (literally "based") is someone who openly displays conservative or hard-right ideology without shame, usually anonymously. A mutual is someone you trinc who trinc you back: a digital relationship, not an analog one. According to those spreading the story, this was the attendees' credential, as they already knew each other through this network of reciprocal contacts. The argument immediately backfired: if the only guarantee is a mutual trinc, the reliability bar drops significantly.

Why do many see it as an unproven hoax?

Because those spreading it provide nothing. From the start, voices pointed out the lack of graphic material and how easy it is to fabricate a mobile conversation. The most repeated argument is that it is a segarro piece, similar to other invented stories that have circulated successfully. Some go further, claiming the operation aims to convince conservative voters that liberal right-wingers practice more sens, as if that discredited the adversary.

"Smoke screen," say others. It is the classic reaction when a scandal with names, positions, and money does not appear: a more flashy fire is lit to cover up the usual issues. That the episode is false, they note, does not prevent it from serving its purpose.

Doxxing, the collateral damage that now has a name

While the veracity was debated, several accounts began publishing personal data of a young woman identified in the screenshots. This is the damage no denial repairs: public shaming turns a rumor into a private conviction. Spreading such data verifies nothing; it only exposes a specific person to an audience that does not know their side. None of the people mentioned have confirmed their participation, and the nature of the rumor makes it impossible to distinguish alleged attendees from mere mentions. The matter thus shifted from a joke to a hunt.

From Villanueva de la Cañada to Alpedrete

The pattern is not new. Years ago, photos of a group of students from a private university in Madrid circulated through messaging apps, fueling a similar scandal, with the difference that then the images existed, and today they are remembered as almost innocent. The mechanics repeat: young people from recognizable environments, an exaggerated sensual narrative, and an audience delighted to be scandalized.

The usual social reproach also emerges, regarding the money invested in these families' education. It circulates faster than any verification.

An uncomfortable label for the conservative ecosystem

What bothers most is not the sens, but the context. Attributing the alleged encounter to young people with surnames, summer homes, and conservative votes touches a specific nerve: the struggle between the traditionalist wing and the liberal wing of the right. The former antiestéticar the episode feeds an image of frivolity; the latter respond that the scandal would not exist if the protagonists were different. And part of the public, outside the trenches, summarizes it with annoyance: adults having relations is not news.

---

At the time of this report, there are no photos, no complaints, and no confirmed names. Only colorful screenshots, anonymous accounts, and an uncomfortable certainty: in the era of the screenshot, a hoax travels faster than any denial.