Has anyone ever hired an interior designer? Is €2,000 worth it?
€2,000 for an interior design study: scam or investment? We look at what the service includes, the conflicting opinions and whether hiring a designer is worth it.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Hiring an interior designer: luxury or necessity? What's behind the €2,000 fee
When you buy a flat and have no clue about decoration, the temptation to delegate is strong. But the residential interior design market in Spain generates as many expectations as misgivings. A detailed analysis of what you actually get for an average fee of 2,000 euros reveals that the key is not the price, but the professional's competence.
The real cost: €2,000 for a complete design study
A recent case illustrates what a standard interior design service for a home includes: space analysis, layout, advice on materials and lighting, floor plans, moodboards and 3D renders, plus furniture selection. The quote, 2,000 euros including VAT, is paid in two halves: one at the start and one when the study is delivered. According to industry sources, this price is even below the market average. However, the recurring question is whether the service adds value beyond what a homeowner could do on their own with the help of an AI or by browsing thousands of photos on property portals.
The big debate: do they really know about structures or only aesthetics?
The most critical view holds that interior designers have no formal training in installations, electricity, plumbing or load-bearing walls. They are accused of designing unrealistic renders that later require costly modifications, and of ignoring construction limits. As an anecdote, there is the case of a load-bearing wall knocked down by an interior designer to create an "open concept", with catastrophic results. On the opposite side, construction professionals who have worked with interior designers claim that the good ones know the technical limitations perfectly and coordinate trades competently. The difference seems to lie in training and experience: an interior designer with a feel for the psychology of space and practical knowledge can make a real difference, while others are simply selling smoke.
Low-cost alternatives: AI, Idealista or instinct?
For those who don't want to pay, options range from asking ChatGPT to copying photos of luxury flats on Idealista. Some even recommend paying a graphic designer 100 euros for a few renders. However, the time and laziness argument carries weight: selecting furniture one by one, searching catalogues, coordinating styles... all of that takes hours that many would rather spend on their work or leisure. Delegating to an interior designer also takes the responsibility for aesthetic decisions off your hands, which for some is a relief and for others a surrender of their home's personality.
The final decision comes down to a classic dichotomy: paying for convenience and someone else's judgement, or investing time and effort in creating your own space. The 2,000 euros can be the best money spent if the professional is competent, or money set on fire if you run into a charlatan. The market offers no guarantees, and word of mouth remains the best filter.
Related debates on the forum
When you buy a flat and have no clue about decoration, the temptation to delegate is strong. But the residential interior design market in Spain generates as many expectations as misgivings. A detailed analysis of what you actually get for an average fee of 2,000 euros reveals that the key is not the price, but the professional's competence.
The real cost: €2,000 for a complete design study
A recent case illustrates what a standard interior design service for a home includes: space analysis, layout, advice on materials and lighting, floor plans, moodboards and 3D renders, plus furniture selection. The quote, 2,000 euros including VAT, is paid in two halves: one at the start and one when the study is delivered. According to industry sources, this price is even below the market average. However, the recurring question is whether the service adds value beyond what a homeowner could do on their own with the help of an AI or by browsing thousands of photos on property portals.
The big debate: do they really know about structures or only aesthetics?
The most critical view holds that interior designers have no formal training in installations, electricity, plumbing or load-bearing walls. They are accused of designing unrealistic renders that later require costly modifications, and of ignoring construction limits. As an anecdote, there is the case of a load-bearing wall knocked down by an interior designer to create an "open concept", with catastrophic results. On the opposite side, construction professionals who have worked with interior designers claim that the good ones know the technical limitations perfectly and coordinate trades competently. The difference seems to lie in training and experience: an interior designer with a feel for the psychology of space and practical knowledge can make a real difference, while others are simply selling smoke.
Low-cost alternatives: AI, Idealista or instinct?
For those who don't want to pay, options range from asking ChatGPT to copying photos of luxury flats on Idealista. Some even recommend paying a graphic designer 100 euros for a few renders. However, the time and laziness argument carries weight: selecting furniture one by one, searching catalogues, coordinating styles... all of that takes hours that many would rather spend on their work or leisure. Delegating to an interior designer also takes the responsibility for aesthetic decisions off your hands, which for some is a relief and for others a surrender of their home's personality.
The final decision comes down to a classic dichotomy: paying for convenience and someone else's judgement, or investing time and effort in creating your own space. The 2,000 euros can be the best money spent if the professional is competent, or money set on fire if you run into a charlatan. The market offers no guarantees, and word of mouth remains the best filter.
Related debates on the forum
- Does anyone know people who have won a big prize in the Bonoloto? · 46 replies
- Those of you studying for civil service exams, do you use the rounds system or the carry-over system? · 15 replies
- The doctor tells me I have to take cholesterol pills forever because my own body produces it, wtf?? · 241 replies
- I'm fat, I weigh 90kg, and I'm going to start going to the gym 3 days a week at 6am · 220 replies
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (41 replies).
More summaries
-
Eating human meat: the fantasy that runs into a deep taboo
Eating human meat: a fantasy that draws mockery, rejection and an old anecdote from journalist Jaime Peñafiel.
-
Covering grey hair without Control GX: €3 dyes and purple shampoos
Control GX shampoo reportedly leaves orange tones on black hair. Cheap dyes and purple shampoos emerge as alternatives.
-
ING brings back its referral scheme with 150 euros per friend
ING is offering 150 euros gross to customers who refer a friend between July and August 2026. Requirements, deadlines and what they don't tell you.
-
New cars come with driver monitoring cameras: safety or nuisance?
New cars now include cameras that monitor the driver. What happens if you cover it? What if you sit badly? One user shares his experience with a Toyota.
-
Lindt chocolate: from 2 to 5.45 euros a pound in two years
Lindt chocolate now costs 5.45 euros a pound, more than double what it did two years ago. Cocoa prices are falling, but the price isn't: speculation or just an excuse.
-
Chinese yacht for 1,000 euros: the costs nobody counts
The 1,000-euro Chinese yacht looks like a bargain on paper: 2,000 for shipping, 4,000 in taxes and 8,000 a year for a mooring.