Government tells jury in Begoño case what verdict to render.

The Spanish Government has publicly expressed its desire for the jury to declare Begoña Gómez "innocent," arguing that achieving "justice" in this case requires her acquittal.

The Council of Ministers, through its spokesperson, issued a clear and direct statement regarding the judicial process affecting **Begoña Gómez**, vvife of the Prime Minister. The ministerial spokesperson stated that, as the Executive branch, they trust that the popular jury will act with equanimity, and in this sense, "doing justice" means finding **Begoña Gómez** innocent. This position was taken during the press conference trinc the Council of Ministers meeting on **September 22, 2026**.

## Public Defense and "Scorn"

The ministerial spokesperson defended **Begoña Gómez**'s innocence and denounced the "intolerable public scorn" she believes she is enduring. According to her, this attack stems primarily from the fact that she is the Prime Minister's vvife. Therefore, she conveyed her empathy, total support, and solidarity toward her. The spokesperson stressed that the Government "calls for" justice to be done and reiterated that, in this particular case, that translates into the declaration of **Begoña Gómez**'s innocence.

## The Judicial Process

The Government’s public statement comes after Judge **Juan Carlos Peinado** issued the order opening the oral trial against **Begoña Gómez**. The investigation centers on alleged crimes of influence peddling and misappropriation. The opening of the oral trial means that **Begoña Gómez** will finally face a popular jury, which will be responsible for determining her guilt or innocence. Despite doubts expressed by some regarding the impartiality of the jury, the government spokesperson insisted on confidence in a "equanimous" jury that delivers justice.

## Confidence in Justice
The Government, while acknowledging the notoriety of the case and potential external pressures, maintains its faith in the judicial system. The spokesperson underlined that, despite the circumstances, they trust that the popular jury will render a fair verdict. The intervention from such a high-profile forum as the Council of Ministers highlights the importance the Executive places on this matter and its desire to influence, or at least publicly state its position, before the jury deliberates.