Forty-two participants, a Kahoot link, and a fixed time: 10:00 PM on Sunday, February 23. The fourth test of the general knowledge tournament started with the promise of lasting between ten and twenty minutes but ended with a trail of voluntary withdrawals, two disputed questions, and a debate about what on earth constitutes general knowledge. The mechanics were simple: five minutes of courtesy for latecomers and a private link for those ready. What no one had foreseen was that a question about bachata and merengue would unleash the storm.
Reggaeton as the Red Line
The first casualty was the atmosphere. One participant announced they were dropping out of the tournament: "It's the same crap whether it's reggaeton or bachata and the rest of Afro-Caribbean dances. If I'd known, I wouldn't have participated. Please, don't count me in anymore if you plan to keep asking these kinds of questions." The organizer's response was not long in coming: "As long as I run the tests, there will be some modern music. There was no reggaeton today." The question, according to its author, was about bachata and merengue. The nuance did little to calm tempers.
Another voice raised the stakes: "All week waiting for this damn reggaeton crap of a test, not knowing who those people are or anything about that crap." The proposal to rename the event as a "test of entertainment and fun with some cultural questions" hung in the air. The irony of the test's author—"What musical genre is that Karol G supposed to belong to, apart from the narcocrazy genre?"—sums up the climate: here, modern music is not debated, it is executed.
Sushi is Not Japanese and the Amazon is Not the Longest
While the musical front burned, another peine in the geography and history section. One participant challenged the question about sushi: "Sushi was actually invented in China. It then came to Japan and later disappeared from China because they concluded it was dirty. I answered Japan because I knew the test creator wouldn't know." The official response clarified: the precedents are in China, but sushi as we know it today evolved in Japan over centuries. The same pattern applied to pizza.
The world's longest river generated its own vote. One participant defended the Amazon, another joined the vote, and a third reasoned: "I would vote for giving credit to the Amazon one too. It's an issue where there is currently no consensus." The organization asked for criteria, not loyalty: "Not because you vote for it, damn it, but because you believe it is fair." The final count left the original answer standing by two votes to one and one. The kangaroo question was also flagged: "Since we are being so pedantic, the kangaroo question would also be controversial. It would be the emu and the kangaroo."
The Podium, the Leadership, and Next Week's Test
With waters more or less calmed, the count arrived. The podium was occupied by the test's author, a participant who voted in favor of accepting the Amazon answer, and the organizer himself. In the general classification, one contestant snatched the leadership from whoever held it until then. The winner of next week's test, of free theme, was asked to confirm they had understood the assignment.
The closing had its own jabs. One participant claimed their method: "If in the end I'm the only one writing proper tests here. Curated questions, good answers, zero reggaeton." Another announced their test will be "of music from the Renaissance to stochastic music," with the warning that "no studying will be needed. You'll just have to guess." And a third left the final verdict on the format: "Reggaeton questions will end when we stop complaining about reggaeton. That's how we bubble-dwellers are, and by extension, Spaniards, essentially pain-in-the-ass."
The tournament is still alive. The next meeting is thematic, and the organizer has already asked the new person in charge for confirmation. What hasn't changed is the unwritten rule: five minutes of courtesy, zero unverified questions, and if modern music comes up, may God distribute luck.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (115 replies).
A simultaneous test in anatomy, biology, medicine, psychology, and zoology determines the podium, cumulative ranking, and the penalty of writing the next quiz.
The second general knowledge tournament quiz resulted in a winner with 7 out of 10 correct answers, according to circulating calculations. A disqualified question affected the final standings.
The passing of internet personality Cesard triggers polarized reactions, sparking a debate about his complex legacy, controversial reputation, and digital footprint.