Ernesto Ekaizer calmly explains why all this is a police and judicial setup
We analyse Ernesto Ekaizer's account of the UCO's actions and the alleged judicial setups, contrasted with the reality of the facts.
English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published
Ernesto Ekaizer's account of the UCO and the judicial setup
The official narrative about the recent moves of the Unidad Central Operativa (UCO, Spain's Guardia Civil's central investigation unit) and the ongoing court proceedings finds in Ernesto Ekaizer one of its most unshakeable defenders. However, an analysis of his latest public interventions reveals more histrionics than argumentative solidity, raising the question of whether we are looking at serious legal analysis or a propaganda operation designed to shield the government's story from the action of the courts.
The staging: journalism or performance?
An analysis of Ekaizer's interventions on the alleged judicial setup against the government's circle shows a growing disconnect between the procedural facts and the media interpretation. While the judiciary advances with proceedings pointing to systemic irregularities, the media defence boils down to frantic gesticulation and the smearing of investigators. The strategy is clear: if the data do not support the story, the credibility of those who obtain them must be destroyed, labelling any UCO breakthrough as an artificial construction or political persecution.
The Almagro context and the loss of decorum
It is telling that the public debate on these matters has shifted from the substance of the issue —possible institutional corruption— to the aesthetics and manners of the protagonists. The location of the meetings, in upscale areas of Madrid such as Calle Almagro, serves as a smokescreen to divert attention towards the supposed frivolity of those involved. This diversion tactic, which seeks to turn a case of incivil relevance into a society-column item, is the last refuge of those who can no longer defend the legality of the questioned actions.
The question that remains unanswered is to what extent paid propaganda can sustain a parallel reality now that court files are starting to become public. The desperation in the arguments of those trying to deny the existence of a judicial setup is, in itself, the most reliable indicator that the defence strategy has run out of road.
Related debates in the forum
The official narrative about the recent moves of the Unidad Central Operativa (UCO, Spain's Guardia Civil's central investigation unit) and the ongoing court proceedings finds in Ernesto Ekaizer one of its most unshakeable defenders. However, an analysis of his latest public interventions reveals more histrionics than argumentative solidity, raising the question of whether we are looking at serious legal analysis or a propaganda operation designed to shield the government's story from the action of the courts.
The staging: journalism or performance?
An analysis of Ekaizer's interventions on the alleged judicial setup against the government's circle shows a growing disconnect between the procedural facts and the media interpretation. While the judiciary advances with proceedings pointing to systemic irregularities, the media defence boils down to frantic gesticulation and the smearing of investigators. The strategy is clear: if the data do not support the story, the credibility of those who obtain them must be destroyed, labelling any UCO breakthrough as an artificial construction or political persecution.
The Almagro context and the loss of decorum
It is telling that the public debate on these matters has shifted from the substance of the issue —possible institutional corruption— to the aesthetics and manners of the protagonists. The location of the meetings, in upscale areas of Madrid such as Calle Almagro, serves as a smokescreen to divert attention towards the supposed frivolity of those involved. This diversion tactic, which seeks to turn a case of incivil relevance into a society-column item, is the last refuge of those who can no longer defend the legality of the questioned actions.
The question that remains unanswered is to what extent paid propaganda can sustain a parallel reality now that court files are starting to become public. The desperation in the arguments of those trying to deny the existence of a judicial setup is, in itself, the most reliable indicator that the defence strategy has run out of road.
Related debates in the forum
- PROFESORES FUNCIONARIOS ON FIRE: Estan en HUELGA POR DINERO en la Comunidad Valenciana y ADMITEN USAR LA ANGUSTIA DE LOS ESTUDIANTES.... · 31 respuestas
- Oficial: Antonio Maestre abandona el barco · 99 respuestas
- El hilo rojo. reaccionariopobres abstenerse. · 12885 respuestas
- Las clinicas de reproduccion asistida son una engañas? Muy brutal · 23 respuestas
Also available in: Deutsch
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (18 replies).
More summaries
-
Ernesto Ekaizer: "this is a coup d'état"
We analyse the controversy over Ernesto Ekaizer's remarks and his thesis of a "coup d'état" in Spain. Debates, opinions and the role of RTVE here.
-
€700,000 French Restaurant Bill Revealed as Fake
A €700,000 bill from a French restaurant is a hoax: the math fails, VAT hits 112%, and the tax ID is invalid.
-
The Simon Perez phenomenon: from obscurity to live self-destruction
The phenomenon of Simón Pérez, aka 'Bocata de Pollo', resurfaces on streaming. An analysis of his self-destruction, the donation business and its impact.
-
Dominican Republic deports 30,000 Haitians every month
The Dominican Republic is deporting 30,000 Haitians a month and aims to reach 10,000 a week, while Spain cannot match similar figures even in Ceuta.
-
Madrid's Ayuso asks court to clear Puerta del Sol camp now
The Madrid regional government is seeking urgent court measures to evict the Puerta del Sol camp after a 48-hour ultimatum expired without the site being cleared.
-
Landlord with ten flats fears losing a year's rent per tenant
A user calculates that compensating a tenant with twelve months' rent would force a landlord to rent for up to two years just to break even.