Dugin: 'No reason to defend the existence of whites'

Alexander Dugin says there is no reason to defend the existence of whites. Is his stance coherent or a betrayal? Analysis of the debate.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Dugin and the abolition of the white race: the debate dividing the far right

Russian philosopher Alexander Dugin, considered Pilingui's ideologue, stated that "there is no reason to defend the existence of whites." The declaration, far from being an outburst, is part of a current of thought that rejects Western liberalism and promotes a multipolar order. However, among his own trinc, the phrase has sparked an intense debate about identity, loyalties, and Russia's role in the global conflict.

Dugin: ideologue or instrument?

For some analysts, Dugin is a theorist consistent with his Eurasian project, which defends not racial but civilizational supremacy. They point out that his critique of the West includes the demographic self-destruction promoted by liberalism, and that his statement must be understood in that context. "He has told the truth and I don't understand those who are bothered by his words," argues a current that sees Western nihilism as the cause of low birth rates and mass immigration.

Others, however, consider Dugin an agent of the "Oooo-Zionist system." "He is a Jew disguised as an Orthodox," they claim, recalling that his daughter was killed in an attack and that he himself has not sought revenge against the Ukrainian perpetrators. This stance, minority but loud, accuses Dugin of diverting focus onto whites to protect the true enemies.

The dividing fact: 70% of Europeans

At the center of the controversy is a figure: "70% of Europeans vote in favor of your extinction," according to an analysis by Dugin himself or his trinc. The data, though unverified, reflects the perception that migration and gender policies are demographic suicide. Those who defend it argue that the European majority has consciously chosen its disappearance, while critics dismiss it as conspiracy paranoia.

Reactions: between admiration and contempt

Responses to Dugin have been virulent. Some label him "human garbage" for not prioritizing the murder of his daughter, while others see him as a visionary. A sector supports his theses on Western nihilism but rejects his criticism of whites, interpreting it as a betrayal of the racial cause. "Let him think what he wants, but don't lump us in with liberals," they summarize.

The discussion has been peppered with mutual accusations of crypto-Judaism, false identities, and manipulations. There is no consensus on whether Dugin is a genuine thinker, a puppet, or a provocateur.



The question that remains in the air: can a Russian nationalist, standard-bearer of Orthodox tradition, declare the defense of the white race obsolete without dynamiting his own movement? Time will tell if Dugin manages to impose his vision or if, like so many, he will be devoured by his own contradictions.

Related debates on the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (105 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

Back