Downloading 120 GB to play a classic: the gamer paradox

Four days downloading 120 GB of Red Dead 2 only to end up playing a pixel classic. The paradox of the modern gamer.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

Downloading 120 GB to play a pixel classic: the gamer paradox

Four days downloading 120 gigabytes of Red Dead Redemption 2 with ultra HD textures, only to end up shooting melon-sized pixels in Might & Magic 6. The contradiction is nothing new, but those who live it first-hand sum it up with a blunt outburst: "How can I be such an idiot?". The time invested in the download —or in installing patches— often exceeds one's patience, and the result is going back to what's safe, to what worked offline, with no updates or hardware requirements.

Size doesn't matter, or does it
The 120 GB of Red Dead 2 miccionan days of downloading even with fiber. For those with short gaming windows —two straight hours is a luxury—, mammoth titles become an ordeal. The alternative: a 1998 classic that takes up less than a gigabyte and launches in seconds. The fantasy, some say, is in the imagination, not in the eyes.

Nostalgia versus hyperreality
The phenomenon is not isolated: it overlaps with those who defend real DIY over virtual reality, and those who abandon modern games for the old ones that didn't demand "two-hour marathon sessions". The industry pushes ever heavier graphics, but the average player seeks efficiency: less waiting, more playing.

The paradox remains open: is the mega-gigabyte worth it if you end up with a 1998 game anyway? The download figure says it all: four days for 120 GB, and in the end, a classic.

Related discussions in the forum

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (14 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back