Do atmospheric water generators actually make safe drinking water?

Atmospheric water generators promise drinking water straight from the air, but their output depends on climate, electricity use and the need for remineralization.

English · Original discussion in Spanish · Published

AWGs: the promise of drinking water from air and their real limits

On an off-grid property with no mains power or running water, the idea of getting drinking water literally out of thin air is tempting. Atmospheric water generators (AWGs) have been on the market for years promising exactly that: condensing ambient humidity, filtering it and delivering clean water. But anyone who has tried these devices knows that physics sets the terms.

How they work and what they actually produce

An AWG is essentially an industrial dehumidifier with a water treatment circuit. It draws in air, cools it until the moisture condenses, then passes the water through a filtration system —usually reverse osmosis— before storing it. The result is by no means safe to drink straight away: the condensate carries dust, volatile compounds, metals from the unit itself and, if not properly sanitized, bacterial biofilm. Strict maintenance and regular testing are required to ensure the water is safe.

The Achilles' heel: climate and the power bill

The performance of these units depends brutally on temperature and relative humidity. In a warm, humid environment an AWG can produce a reasonable number of liters; but with cold or dry air output plummets and energy consumption per liter skyrockets. On the most optimistic calculations, the cost-to-volume ratio is only barely viable under very favorable conditions. For perspective, a domestic electric distiller takes about four hours to produce four liters, with an electricity cost that puts many users off.

The problem with distilled water and mineralization

Water obtained by condensation is distilled, meaning it lacks mineral salts. Drinking it continuously without remineralizing it can cause imbalances. Mineral sachets exist, but they add a recurring cost and some inconvenience. In the prepping world, where total self-sufficiency is the goal, having to rely on external supplies to make AWG water drinkable makes the solution less appealing.

Alternatives and real-world viability

For an off-grid home, combining rainwater for general uses, solar power and an AWG for drinking could cover the basics, but only if the climate cooperates. Manufacturers advertise maximum figures that are rarely achieved in practice; users should look at the liters/day curve at the actual humidity of their location, not the marketing peak. And when doing the math, the cost of the unit plus filters, electricity and mineralization can exceed other options such as solar distillation or efficient rainwater harvesting.

The sobering figure: a mid-range AWG consumes as much electricity in a year as a large refrigerator, to produce barely the water one person drinks. Self-sufficiency comes at a price, and in this case the flow from the air tap is more expensive than it looks.

Also available in: Deutsch

Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication. Read the full discussion (11 replies).

More summaries

All summaries in English →

-
Back