DANA Judge Requests El Ventorro Dining Room Dimensions

DANA Judge Requests El Ventorro Dining Room Dimensions

One room. Some measurements. One bill. The judge investigating the DANA case in Valencia has requested exact dimensions of the dining room at El Ventorro restaurant, where former Generalitat President Carlos Mazón and former Counselor Salomé Pradas reportedly ate, along with that day's invoice. Leaked to media, this request sparked controversy: from jokes about sugar versus saccharin coffee to suspicions that the investigation prioritizes narrative over crime.

The case has been under investigation for over a year. The figure haunting the entire affair is 229 deaths, the toll frequently cited regarding flood management. In this context, asking about dining room size seems disproportionate to some, while others view it as crucial detail dismantling alibis.

What Is and Isn't Investigated in the DANA Case

Critics list what remains uninvestigated: two-decade-old approved projects never executed, riverbeds turned into dumps, construction in flood-prone zones, the chain of orders from ministry to officials opening gates, and hydrographic confederation powers. Compared to these, checking dining room dimensions and meal receipts appears anomalous.

Some argue the judge seeks a narrative, not a crime: reconstructing that day's timeline to determine who knew what and when. Parking exit times, tickets, and restaurant bills help establish a chronology contradicting official versions. Proponents claim lies are debunked by documents, not speeches.

Conversely, accusations of bias persist. The High Court of Justice Prosecutor's Office sees insufficient evidence to investigate Mazón, preferring the case stay in Catarroja. This instruction contrasts with other cases where official emails were requested. Double standards are the most common criticism.

Why Did a Flood Cause 229 Deaths?

Technical aspects often take a backseat. Emergency services must function fully regardless of the regional president's location. Protocols, on-duty professionals, hydrographic confederations, and the state meteorological agency exist. Whether the political leader was reachable raises uncomfortable questions about decision chains.

The repeated answer is uncomfortable for all: likely nothing changed. If he had been in a Madrid meeting instead of lunch, the outcome would have been identical. This conclusion exonerates the politician from causal responsibility but not the system. Focus shifts to competent bodies monitoring flow meters disappearing, one million liters per second, and undredged ravines.

Flow meter details worry data analysts more than TV viewers. If a sensor fails an alert system without reaction, the fault lies with those on duty, not those eating out.

Parking Tickets and Debunked Versions

Investigations accumulated documents allegedly contradicting successive accounts of Mazón's arrival at the Palau de la Generalitat. Parking tickets, restaurant bills, and exit times narrowed margins for narratives corrected on the fly.

The lingering question is why these documents weren't requested earlier. Over a year has passed. Current requests for meal bills and room sizes suggest accumulation of details rather than a clear thesis. For a case with 229 deaths, this frustrates those expecting quick answers.

---

A disorienting fact remains: prosecutors see insufficient evidence to investigate the former president, wanting the case in Catarroja. Meanwhile, the judge measures the dining room. Someone will be right. But neither version brings back the 229 dead.