You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Child pokes holes in watermelon: who pays for a minor's damage in Spain?
A child pokes holes in a watermelon, the mother says 'it's nothing' and the vendor demands she pay for it: the legal and social debate that has taken social media by storm.
A video circulating for days shows a child poking holes in an already-cut watermelon. The mother responds to the vendor with an "it's nothing." The vendor insists she buy it. She says no. That one minute of conversation contains the entire legal debate over who answers for the damage minors cause in a shop.
Under Spanish law, the answer is not as simple as the mother's "it's nothing." If a minor destroys a product, civil liability falls on the parents depending on the child's age and level of discernment. The shopkeeper cannot force anyone to buy the damaged item, but can claim compensation for the loss. What the video shows is the tension between the emotional reaction and the rule.
The phrase "the Devil carries the watermelons away," which accompanies the video as it spreads, captures the comic fatalism of the affair. On social media, the scene has sparked all kinds of reactions: some believe the mother should cover the cost as a matter of parental responsibility, while others think the shop should accept a certain risk by keeping products within children's reach. There is also the old habit of asking about the child's race whenever a minor misbehaves, a reflex that says more about the commenter than about the video.
At its core is a classic consumer paradox: nobody wants to pay for what they did not buy, but everyone expects the responsible party to shoulder their share. The video is no longer easy to find online, which adds a touch of mystery and more than one ironic comment. Nobody knows how much that watermelon cost, but the debate it has peine is worth more than a melon from another era.
Summary of a discussion on Burbuja.info - Foro de economía, actualidad y política., translated from Spanish and reviewed before publication.
Read the full discussion (11 replies).
The little blue pill no longer waits for sixty: more and more men under 40 use it without a diagnosis, and the grey market sells it without a prescription
How much training time does it take to get strong? Two years of consistency seems to be the real threshold, according to the experience of those who have achieved it.