Ceuta is Spain. Therefore… (Juan Carlos Girauta in El Debate)

The assertion that "Ceuta is Spain" contrasts sharply with the reality of a territory where the creation of a "parallel order"—with norms and authorities external to Spanish law—is denounced, generating tension and debate regarding sovereignty and security.

## The reality in Ceuta: a parallel order

The sovereignty of **Ceuta** as part of Spain is challenged by the denunciation of a situation that goes beyond simple migration management. There is talk of the construction of a "parallel order," a social and normative framework unrelated to Spanish laws that is taking root in the city. This situation, described as legally and socially intolerable, manifests through the organization of groups with their own hierarchies, division of responsibilities, and imposition of norms and guidelines that do not correspond to the legislation of the ground they occupy. The existence of "parallel guards" and "protected businesses" is mentioned, which obstruct the normal functioning of life for the **eighty thousand Spanish residents** and, according to accounts, fosters prejudices and unpunished abusa. The situation has reached a point where it is denounced that women are compelled to modify their behaviour, covering up more and going out in groups, due to the perception of an environment marked by insecurity and barbarity.

## The echo of words and the political response

The claims about the situation in Ceuta have generated intense debate, particularly regarding sovereignty and the political response. The idea that "Ceuta is Spain" is used as a starting point to question the passivity in the face of this "parallel order." The criticism is aimed at the lack of condemnation regarding statements suggesting that Ceuta could be a colony, finding the silence on such claims unworthy. It is pointed out that this situation has been allowed because those in power in Spain have led certain groups to believe their actions will go unpunished. **Sánchez**'s words, praising the cooperation and intelligence of the "invaders," are interpreted as an insult to the flag and to the unity of Spain, suggesting a disconnect between the perceived reality in Ceuta and the government's stance.

## The vision of an uncertain future

The complexity of the situation in Ceuta is compounded when considering the implications of what is described as an "Sarracinization of Europe" and interpretations regarding the motivations of young migrants. Reference is made to works such as "Presa" by **Ayaan Hirsi Ali** to understand the mindsets at play in this context. The perception is that a "new normality" has been created in the city, characterized by "savagery" and absence of law, where traditional values are threatened and women are viewed as objects. The urgency for a "necessary realism" is presented as the only way to reverse this situation, suggesting that the lack of a forceful response and permissiveness have contributed to the escalation of problems. The final assertion that "Ceuta is Spain" is raised as a starting point to demand firm action and defend territorial integrity and the rule of law.